RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Not one comment in favor of the merger... Proph wrote - savings from streamlining the two businesses by eliminating the TSX-V listing, having one CFO, etc., as opposed to two, and having one IR function, etc.
Well guess what proph, we get the same by voting NO, 1 CEO who will not be getting $960,000 in consulting fees, a BoD or less than 10, one IR function that actually functions and best of all we get a company coming back to the shareholders who will have a say. A company that will NOT over promise while NOT delivering. We will not have to pay for a Nasdaq listing as it serves no purpose but to stoke gagnon's ego.
Why, because the new CEO will realize that the shareholders mean business and will hold all directors and executives responsible
So a vote NO will deliver everything you said at a reduced cost and increased shareholder value and BoD and executive comp ability and accountability.