Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Pulsar Helium Inc V.PLSR

Alternate Symbol(s):  PSRHF

Pulsar Helium Inc. is a Canada-based helium exploration and development company. The Company’s portfolio consists of its flagship Topaz helium project in Minnesota, United States, and the Tunu helium project in Greenland. The Topaz is located in the state of Minnesota, 100 kilometers (km) north of the regional center of Duluth. The Tunu Project consists of a Special Mineral Exploration License (MEL-S 2021-45) that covers Liverpool Land in East Greenland and has an area of 2,772 square kilometers (km2) and a Mineral Prospecting License (MPL 2021-46) that covers East Greenland. The project is on the east coast of Greenland in Liverpool Land, a peninsula in eastern Greenland which faces the main European continent. It is five km from Ittoqqortoormiit and 40 km from the Nerlerit Inaat International Airport (CNP).


TSXV:PLSR - Post by User

Comment by HeliumHighon May 10, 2024 1:56pm
104 Views
Post# 36034043

RE:RE:Analysis of Proposed Minnesota Statute/Regulation

RE:RE:Analysis of Proposed Minnesota Statute/RegulationUnfortunately, "proposals by lawmakers who have little understanding of the industry" have a bad habbit of actually become law in state legislatures. If this bill is passed in Minnesota, "the laws in place in other jurisdictions" and "industry norms" will NOT supersede a bad state law that has been adoped in the state in which we are trying to develop a resource.  It would then be necessary for PLSR and others in the industry to try to convince the MN legislature to amend its originally adopted laws, which is a LOT harder than trying to get the right adjustments to a bill before it becomes law in the first place.  

As alluded to earlier, I have already been burned by industry-ignorant, environmental-fear-mongering in other states.  See, for example, Arizona which is normally a more right-leaning state - but when the current Democrat Gov. Hobbs took over, the state government turned quite hostile on helium production (again industry-ignorant, environmental fear mongering), resulting in a permitting requirements situation that largely cut off a lot of seemingly exciting helium development/production that was imminent there.  This is not the appropriate board to get into the details of that sitaution, but I desperately don't want a "repeat" of that story here...
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>