Another odd point" In its response to the District’s comment during the CEQA process about the insufficiency of the SWP water supply, the City estimated that the total increase in demand for water over 20 years from the City and the District’s other customers would amount to 1,894.5 afy. (AR 3309.) The City reasoned that because the 1,894.5 afy increase is small in comparison to the 6,407.6 afy of SWP water that the District receives annually,6 water will be available to the City. (AR 3309.) But this comparison is not useful because it does not consider the current annual demand for the District’s SWP water. If, for example, the average annual demand for SWP water already outstrips the average annual supply, then any further increase in demand could be a significant detriment to the availability of water for the City and other water users relying on the District "
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
" But this comparison is not useful because it does not consider the current annual demand for the District’s SWP water. "
Say what?