I simply cannot get passed this one itemIn the March 18th news release, and I quote;
" The TCCWD is desperate for some technical victory on a limited re-write of the WSA so they can make a claim to retrieve their legal fees. This has no impact on the schedule of building Sage Ranch nor stopping its progress. "
That is not forward-looking guidance, or anything that can be covered by the butt-covering clauses at the end of every news release. That is presented as a statement of fact, which apparently turned out to be inaccurate. How many investors bought on that assurance? I just don't understand how that passes muster? JMO