This is 100% leoLeo accuses me of calling him a elitist. Actually I never called leo an elitist. However, it is interesting to note that he likes the idea that others may think I did.
Actually, I have always assessed Leo based on the quality and content of the opinions he has expressed here. It should be noted that he has posted here for a number of years under different usernames; he has never been a shareholder or made overtures of being one; he antagonized shareholders by frequently referring to them as "Dumbazz.;" he constantly displayed emotional bias against management and the co.s technological claimed asset; .....et................
What Leo never did was to provide constructive critical analysis backed by endorsed opinions from recognized industry individuals, standard bodies, organizations, other companies including competitors et.........................
Per esempio: After Leo made general disparaging opinions about the POC and pilot results, questioning the validity including testing procedures he did not think it necessary to even defend himself by doing what he demanded from others. When leo was asked directly to provide formal tests results from competitors as a rebuttal to YFIs` and Liberty Globals` claims he goes mute by running away, hiding or......
No, based on the above which constitutesonly a few samplings of Leo`s contributions to this forum, I definitely would not call Leo an elistist.
However, if anyone involved in the wi-fi industry referred to Leo as a CHEAP COUNTERFEIT, I definitely would not argue with them.