Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Green Battery Minerals Inc V.GEM

Alternate Symbol(s):  GBMIF

Green Battery Minerals Inc. is an exploration-stage company. The Company’s principal business activities include the exploration and development of natural resource properties. Its Berkwood Graphite Project is located within the jurisdiction of Quebec, in the Manicouagan Regional County Municipality, three hours driving time from the city of Baie-Comeau. Its Stallion Gold Project is located in the northeastern region of the prolifically metal-endowed Stikinia geological terrane. Stallion covers over 30 square kilometers and is on a regional trend with several past producing mines, such as Baker, Shasta and the world-class Kemess Mine. The Jupiter Lithium Project is an early-stage exploration opportunity which comprises a total of 122 Quebec mineral exploration claims which amount to a total of 6406 hectares. The Boudrias Project comprises a total of seven Quebec mineral exploration claims which amount to a total of 392.1 hectares.


TSXV:GEM - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Jul 16, 2024 4:47pm
83 Views
Post# 36135569

MAKE CANADA GREAT AGAIN ( British Empire )

MAKE CANADA GREAT AGAIN ( British Empire )

Where did Canada go wrong ?
We use to be a world class leader in mining / minng markets.

The Plan ?
Let's try to fix it.


ESG + NET Zero Complinces  -----> Green Tech Start Ups + Stakeholders + Gov

ESG + NET Zero
No problem.  Most agree with this.



ISSUE ?
In my opinion Green Tech Start Ups + Existing Tech joining the Green Cirlce Economy
has exhausted UK's Empire money machine. Countless hiring of new employees
along with costs associated to keep each up n running  vs  what have each of them
achieved to earn their worth ?

Technologies are good...
but to what extent should one devote such enormous eneries and funding if the cause
has not produced any profits = bad economics.

At Present
Canadian junior's with critical minerals are stagnent.
How can this be if critical minerals are so desperately needed ?

System
select projects chosen  ( crushes rest of economy moving forward / other projects
Gov weak on grant funding
17% grade project sits while 4.5% grade is moved forward
Juniors must link with Gov't  tech
Gov tech is not the best 

Weak Gov Funding
Weak Gov Tech
= doors wide open for = Foriegn Investment + Run to China
= Disadvantage Canada / British Empire

BC Silica - gone stateside
QC Graphite - going stateside
AB oilsands - going stateside

US has the $40 billion dollar chip plant in,
Arizona and another being built in, Tenessee.

What's Canada doing besides throwing billions at foriegn companies to set
shop up in Canada ?

Where did RB Lithium go back in the day ?
What happened to Nemaska Lithium ?

Here is Canada's Research Council  ( roster list )
https://nrc.canada.ca/en/research-development/research-collaboration/programs

Lots of Programs
Lots of R & D

Yet... throw a junior critical mineral project into this stew and it most likely will
never see the light of day... R & D will feast on it for years ultimately controlling
all aspects of it -----> ensuring it's own R & D survival monies.

It's the same situation with foriegn tech / Schwab 
Energy intensive, Employee intensive, Capital intensive
= Exhausting Canada + British Empire ( which could be concerning )

What's the Resolve ?
It would have to entail... Simplicity.
Less capital intesive, less confusing --------> streamline
With an outcome of 100% guarantee success

How ?
There is only one program Canada and British Empire need.
- Ore Processing with intent to stockpile reserves

Better mining proceeduees which capture all valued minerals in each project.
17% Cgr and deposit also has 8% Al, 10% Fe, 2.5% P,  50% Si  etc.... 

Ores are already being milled -----> Grab majority of elements.
Less tailings. 
No more tailing mined in future.

HOW DOES THIS RESOLVE WHAT IS NOW ?
Simply put, all projects enter into Gov extractions.
Ore characterization that focalizes on all valued minerals.
Minimal tailings ----> Better reclamations.

REFINING
High purity refining
better than ( example ) flake graphite with impurities which require sphericising to
correct conductivity. Flake, Lump limits each deposits fullest potential
versus - refining each element maximizes all element potential
= many deposits come in to play / qualify

BEST PART ?
High purity graphite ( grease )
High purity carbon
High purity silica or SiC ( moissanite )
High purity Aluminum, Titanium, Iron, Phosphorus, Boron...etc.

END SUM ?
You've matched China
You're a real contender
High purity elements that can be directed at various technologies - at will.

Gov apart of Extraction
Junior has resource
Together each link high purity elements to tech - worldwide.

ONE MAIN FOCUS
Simple extractive focus
Gov funding to junior to enter Gov extraction programs
More projects enter Gov extraction testing
= Market stimulous

   GOV
= Outlines set tonnages of each element in stockpile reserves
= High purity reserves act as tangible wealth ( credit rating / wealth of country )
= high purity elements on demand ready to use - Gov knows what, where who wants
= TECH comes to you buying minerals  ( vs ) tech team with jr - spin in circles )

= win / win
 

TECH
Gov nor Green start ups don't have all the technologies.
Gov with hp stockpiled elements ----> control mineral -----> control purchse future trace
= Simple
Private sectors contributes much of tecnology
Britian would save enormous $$$  less funds dished out to wef tech

With this type of " simple approach " Canada and British Empire streamline
reducing enormous amounts of capital funding while creating far higher odds of success.
Full control over traceable resources and their 2nd, 3rd... or more generations.


Simple
Effective
Reduces Costs
Less Confusion
Extractive Focus
Country creates stockpiles
Reduces Green Tech capital / employment worldwide ( excess )
Breaks circle economy keeping everyone sponning in circles
Promotes usable elements / emmulates china model
More projects come online
More odds of success
Less capital strain on British Empire 
Guards British Empire / from 3rd party stakeholder tech which creates potential adversary


Cheers...


This post is anther idea for Quebec or.., Canada.
Addition to, 4 Pack.



 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>