RE:Article translated, from the Colombian point of view...I mean there is BS and then there is this....
Seriously, the tribunal concluded that implementation of the ban violated minimum standards of treatment, but then concluding that there was no harm??????
"Yes, I broken into your house and stole everything then burned it to the ground, but there is no evidence that there was any harm" said Colombia.
Anyway, the wording of that article makes it pretty clear that this property is done. How can Colombia conclude that paramo is sacred for water and then permit future mining?
This was a classic case of a banana republic encouraging investment, allowing a foreign company to define a resource, and then stealing it back.