Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Snowline Gold Corp V.SGD

Alternate Symbol(s):  SNWGF

Snowline Gold Corp. is a Canada-based gold exploration company. The Company operates an eight-project portfolio covering approximately 333,000 hectares (ha). The Company is engaged in exploring its flagship project consisting of approximately 94,000 ha Rogue and Einarson gold projects in the highly prospective, underexplored Selwyn Basin. The Company’s project portfolio includes Einarson, Rogue, Tosh, Cliff, Rainbow, Cynthia, and Ursa claims. The Einarson property consists of two main claim blocks and several outlying claim groups covering a combined 61,690 hectares. The Rogue Property comprises 442 mineral claims covering 11,227 hectares. The Cliff Property covers approximately 2,724 hectares. The Tosh Property covers approximately 3,700 hectares and is located 20 kilometers (km) from the paved, all-season Alaska Highway. The Rainbow Property covers approximately 1,225 ha. The Cynthia Property covers approximately 1,399 hectares. The Ursa claims covers approximately 7,755 hectares.


TSXV:SGD - Post by User

Comment by AlwaysLong683on Aug 01, 2024 12:36am
136 Views
Post# 36157592

RE:RE:RE:Stopped some drilling?

RE:RE:RE:Stopped some drilling?"They have only reported on 2 holes so far this year from their 2024 drilling campaign. Two BEYOND killer holes by the way."

You really believe SGD has only received assay results for two cores so far? Repubable companies will of course lead their press release with their best holes, but will also list the rest of the assay results later on in the press release. SGD didn't do that. Maybe another reason why potential investors are cautious on this name along with the Victoria Gold mine incident....? In contrast, GBR kept an ongoing, updated list of every assay result received right on their website for anyone to view whenever they wished.

Agree that any mine build at Valley is years away, but this type of incident at Victoria may result in additional funds being spent to satisfy the security of the operation so that the incident isn't repeated. I suspect the construction of a mining and mill project built at Valley up to first pour will have and initial capital expenditure of $2B - $3B, and it will likely end up on the high side of this range given the likely need to spend additional money bullet-proofing any heap leach / tailings pond operations to ensure no contamination of soil or water. I think SGD CEO Berdahl feels it is important to run and environmentally sound operation even before the Victory Gold incident and BTO (the company I expect will buy SGD) is known for its environmentally friendly mining operations, so either BTO buys SGD without SGD producing a FS or BTO does their own estimates as to what a FS might look like and make an offer accordingly.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>