RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:video interviewYou are correct. The word "sounds" is deliberately used to make sure it is not perceived as a matter of fact. That's beside the reasonable hypothesis that those interested on HPQ and vocal here should be watching every video and coming to their own conclusion. Too many posters on this thread, especially pumpers, do not care about ensuring factual representation.
For the insiders, it depends how you split directors, shares and warrant. Individually some directors own less than a million shares. They certainly do play it as they see fit. If I was sitting on a board of a company on the cusp of greatness, I would have no problem minimally putting back $23K-$30K of my annual director fees into the stock - a great investment and a signal of confidence to investors. That's fitting for me. It may be fitting for others in business not do so because they have so much money and do not want more, but will take the compensation that HPQ could use for operating purposes. I don't care what and why, but it is broadly accepted that seeing insider buying is a good thing (when not surrounded by selling).