RE:AGM questions Maybe someone can ask:
1. Why did Tribukait decide against seeking re-election?
2. Is the plan to go forward with 5 Board of Directors and a non-independent board, against the recommendations set in 58-201?
3. How is Dennis Mills considered Independent , having participated in the Pacific Rubiales PP in 2013 if De Alba and Cabrales being part of FEC are considered non-independent?
4. Without Board independence, what recourse to minority shareholders have for the Board's lack of fiduciary? Quarterly financials, audits, lab reports, working interest transfers, etc.?
5. In light of the formal valuation, why weren't SE Stabroek wells adjacent to corentyne considered in the pricing after Kawa-1, especially if Kawa was analogous to the block 58 wells?
6. Given the pay zones found at Kawa-1, why was the same pricing matarix used to transfer working interest before and after the well, without regard to obtained geological/seismic data and wireline logs in the Kawa well?
7. Was Hannam & Partners paid for a success fee for their valuation - which committee at CGX was responsible for valuing H&Ps independence? Can you disclose H&P's full analsis on their pricing?
8. Who supervised the formal valuation done by Hannam & Partners?
9. Why hasn't the 4.5% working interest transfer been approved by the Guyanese Government
10. Is CGX Currently under investigation by the OSC and/or TSX.V?
11. What data is the Guyanese Government asking for to extend the license? Was it provided and when?
12. What is the probability CGX will lose the Corentyne license?
13. Why on earth can't anyone get in touch via Houston or Toronto phone numbers?
I like WCP's question about the port, why is the opening consistently pushed to the right? Given two labs that reported the prospective resources, what was the disclosed contingent resources, given the fluid, core, and LWD submitted?
I think that's it for now. Probably won't get any answers. But thanks for asking.