Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc V.GRB

Alternate Symbol(s):  GEBRF

Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc. is a developer of sustainable entry-level housing and renewable energy projects. The Company’s primary business is the acquisition, management, development, and possible sale of real estate and renewable energy projects. It operates through three segments: real estate development in the United States (Real Estate), solar energy projects in Puerto Rico (Solar Energy) and corporate headquarters located in Canada (Corporate). The Company is focused on building two large-scale projects, namely Sage Ranch in Tehachapi, California and Montalva in Guanica, Puerto Rico. Sage Ranch is a real estate community of over 995 entry-level homes in the Tehachapi Valley, a community located in southern California. Its Montalva property (1,747 acres) is a large utility-scale solar and battery storage building with an initial size of 80 MWac or 160 MWdc, located in the southwestern coastal area of Puerto Rico. Its Cordero Ranch property is located in Cedar City, Utah.


TSXV:GRB - Post by User

Comment by tylerreddickon Aug 29, 2024 10:15pm
88 Views
Post# 36202230

RE:RE:RE:VOYA Financing

RE:RE:RE:VOYA Financing
shneps wrote: I can tell you that millions of dollars spent on engineering is part of the construction budget.
As you say, unless VOYA has approved them to do this but again why wouldn't the most up to date information be provided instead of negative speculation around every corner. 


The engineering/architectual upfront costs are certainly part of the capital costs of the project.
But I doubt VOYA would have had any part in financing those costs due to the uncertainty that the project would ever get off the ground, at least in its present form. The risk to their capital would be simply too high. 

But you are 100% correct, that the lack of any updates from the company leaves a vacuum that investors are trying to fill by searching for any public information available, and drawing conclusions from that. Whether or not those conclussions prove accurate will only be clarified when the company provides the long overdue details.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>