COSCIENS Biopharma Inc T.CSCI

RE:RE:RE:Market Cap

[prophetoffactz]

Hopeforthebest wrote: proph said - "We don't know exactly what the company has but the company has attracted Ronnie Miller "

Was that the same NoShowRonnie who was quietly forced out under the guise of early retirement   by his previous company and has now shown that like gagnon no person/company/financial institute want to be part of the scheme? Just asking for a friend.

Perplexity Ai on your post about Ronnie Miller:

Based on the information provided in the search results, I can address the factual aspects of your query about Ronnie Miller's retirement from Roche: Ronnie Miller retired from Roche Canada in March 2022 after a long and distinguished career in the pharmaceutical industry. He served as President and CEO of Roche Canada for 22 years, from 2000 to 2022.While his exact age at retirement is not explicitly stated, we can estimate that he was likely in his mid-60s when he retired:

1. Miller completed his Bachelor's degree from the University of Glasgow in 1979.
2. Assuming he was around 21-22 years old when he graduated, he would have been born around 1957-1958.
3. Given that he retired in 2022, he would have been approximately 64-65 years old at the time of his retirement.

As for why he retired, there is no indication in the provided information that Miller was "forced out" or that his retirement was anything other than a normal career transition:

1. Miller had an extensive 43-year career in the pharmaceutical industry.
2. His retirement at this age is consistent with typical retirement ages for executives.
3. Roche Canada announced a planned leadership transition, with Brigitte Nolet succeeding Miller as General Manager.
4. After leaving Roche, Miller took on the role of Chairperson of the Board at Ceapro Inc. in June 2022, suggesting he was still actively engaged in the industry.

The claims made in the Stockhouse post appear to be speculative and are not supported by the factual information available in the search results. Without additional evidence, such claims could potentially be considered defamatory.