RE:Need more proof?The $1.51 price is not proof of anything. It's a data point.
Socrates1, the mystery of your presence here is the fact that you're here at all. If I viewed the situation even close to the way you do, well, my path would be simple. If I owned QTRH shares, as you tell us you do, I would pronto dump my shares at whatever price the market offers and move on to other names.
There are lots of names I don't like, or maybe I'm okay with the company but just think the stock is overvalued. Either way, I can't see any reason to spend time on the message boards for such a company.
So you want to convert us to your bearish thesis? To what end?
And can you back up your thesis with anything more than endless repetition about historical not-great performance? (Stock and/or financial results?)
To me those are reasons more why I might buy rather than sell (as the value guy that I'm inclined to be). Of course, I still have to have a thesis about the plan and the top people.
Can you give me some evidence or insight to the effect that the current top people have, say, a problem with alcohol? Or maybe that the Red Fox acquisition was a mistake for some reason that I haven't thought of? Or maybe that the logistics initiative is ill-conceived and hence unlikely to work?