RE:RE:RE:Why the sellingOf course AMK has to disclose competing offers. If one were made right now, Id suggest that AMK would need to get stock halted ASAP. and get NR out ASAP (in less than 24 hours).
would you consider a bid for 35 cents, with cash in hand, a competing bid????
rusty111 wrote: Signman wrote: The GEM credit increase is a dead give away that they (Cunbningham / GEM) know this and are prepared for a counter offer IMO. With the TUD NR today had got to be making any major, that heard Ken at Beaver Creek, sit up in their chair. And the easiest why to get into this project with 20% would be to take AMK out over what Cunnigham has offered. I still have hope ... there is time ... No tokens listed yet nor sales of it. GEMs increase of credit IMO was not for "other" aquisitions but to get through a counter offer. Ask yourself why would you increase credit more than double for a company that has not yet completed the initial buy and proof of concept of "tokenization" adopted sucessfully?
AMK will have to disclose competitive offers correct ?
What's the timeline when we should here from Darren Blaney again ?