RE:RE:RE:Devolv tit for tat... Is it possible...that this knee-jerk reaction by devlolve simply a 'defensive' move in attempt to preserve some of their recent installs? By that I mean that clients who have purchased part of the solution and can simply add the ill-thought out bag thing to avoid full replacement? That is the only semi-logical reason I can think of, and if there is any rhyme or reason to this, and that is the depth of thinking at devolve, then I think it's only a matter of time before X1 will be declaring 'check-mate' in this match.