Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Mako Mining Corp V.MKO

Alternate Symbol(s):  MAKOF

Mako Mining Corp. is a gold mining, development, and exploration company. The Company operates the high-grade San Albino gold mine in Nueva Segovia, Nicaragua. It also owns the Eagle Mountain Gold Project in Guyana, South America. The Company’s primary asset is San Albino mine, an open pit mine located in Nicaragua. Its San Albino gold project is an open pit development project located in Nueva Segovia, Nicaragua, approximately 173 kilometers north of Managua and accessible through a paved highway. Its Las Conchitas area is located approximately 2.5 kilometers south of its high-grade San Albino Gold Deposit and is situated near the southern end of the Corona de Oro Gold Belt. The Eagle Mountain Project comprises two gold deposits, Eagle Mountain and Salbora, in addition to several other exploration targets. Its subsidiaries include Gold Belt, S.A., Nicoz Resources, S.A., and Mako US Corp.


TSXV:MKO - Post by User

Comment by AkibaLeismanon Sep 20, 2024 4:42pm
155 Views
Post# 36233930

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Share price

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Share price

"Does that mean that you have decided to never increase this mines production beyond where production sits today"

no.  It means that when we pulled back from an internally funded US$15.5m p.a. exploration spend in Q3 2022 to a US$8m p.a. internally funded exploration spend now, there were very real repurcussions as to how quickly we could prove out a mineable resource that we could prudently deplete at 1000tpd.  

There were also very real repercussions to bifurcating the Las Conchitas permitting into a bulk sample and then EIA approach back in Q4 2022.  
 

Both decisions caused expansion delays (expanding 20% over nameplate vs 100%) and production volatility (Q1/2 2023 and Q3 2024).  Both decisions avoided the need for raising additional capital.  I believe I made the right decision given where we were at the time.  But I'm not a magician, so there were tradeoffs. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>