Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Blue Sky Uranium Corp BKUCF


Primary Symbol: V.BSK

Blue Sky Uranium Corp. is a uranium and vanadium exploration company. The Company controls more than 480,000 hectares with the potential for uranium resources in Rio Negro, Chubut, Neuquen, and Mendoza provinces. Its projects include the Amarillo Grande Project, the Sierra Colonia Project, the Tierras Coloradas Project, Cerro Parva Project, Corcovo Project, and Chihuidos Project. The Company's flagship Amarillo Grande Project is located in central Rio Negro province, in the Patagonia region of southern Argentina. The Corcovo Project is comprised of two adjacent exploration properties totaling approximately 20,000 ha at the northeastern edge of the Neuquen basin. The Chihuidos project is comprised of six exploration property units totaling almost 60,000 hectares located 60 kilometers (km) west of Anelo city. The Sierra Colonia project includes 100% ownership of more than 28,470 hectares in the central-eastern part of Chubut Province.


TSXV:BSK - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Sep 20, 2024 8:39pm
73 Views
Post# 36234267

4 OPTIMIZATION ( potentials )

4 OPTIMIZATION ( potentials )- Course Gravels -----> crush, mill -----> potential uranium bearing ore
- REE's other elements are present in deposit
- Uranium rich waters ( mentioned in press ) brine extraction
- Capping was used in resource grading - lower grades applied vs keeping higher grade


4 Optimizer
i'd be working on vs seeking new claims.

#1
Course gravels ( pea press )
stockpiled  ( interesting )   75% mass tonnage parked ( refer to my prior post )

75% of the mill feed mass from which most of the original uranium and vanadium has been stripped) will be dewatered, and either stockpiled on surface (during the first three years of operations) or backhauled by the mine fleet for backfill into containment cells within mined out sections of the pit.

https://blueskyuranium.com/news-releases/blue-sky-uranium-announces-a-positive-new-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-ivana-uranium-vanadium-deposit-amarillo/

#2
REE's
no assay values
by default ree's would respond just as well as uranium - dissolve into pregnant leach

Geostatistical analysis has been carried out on the geochemical exploration data from Ivana North.  Elements which show positive correlation with anomalous uranium values include cobalt, copper, lanthanum, molybdenum, rhenium, selenium, and yttrium. Molybdenum and selenium display the best positive correlation with higher uranium values, a relationship also observed at the Ivana deposit (see Figure 2a-c).

https://blueskyuranium.com/news-releases/blue-sky-uranium-provides-drilling-activity-update-for-amarillo-grande-uranium-project-argentina/

#3
Uranium Rich Waters
testing sub aquifers or surficial water bodies for uranium + ree presence
= smart
= could exponentially increase resource size

The presence of lanthanum and yttrium is currently interpreted to be related to a process prior to mineralization where acidic water generated secondary porosity and prepared the host rock for the entrance of the uranium-rich underground waters from the regional mineralizing system.

https://blueskyuranium.com/news-releases/blue-sky-uranium-provides-drilling-activity-update-for-amarillo-grande-uranium-project-argentina/


Resource Grade Capping
PEA - Higer grades saw lessor grades applied
If minerals have undergone natural leaching sub surface by natural conditions
chances are -----> oxides or other mineral leach formats form richer grade
concentrate strata = resulting in higher grade values to settle / creating higher grade basement.

PEA does distinguish between upper / lower strata
upper - 0.014% U
lower - 0.042% U

https://blueskyuranium.com/news-releases/blue-sky-uranium-announces-a-positive-new-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-ivana-uranium-vanadium-deposit-amarillo/


VERSUS - what i'm referring to are the 3 categories
course gravels, red sands, sands
which contain far higher grades seen in chart below ( 2012 )

If 350 new holes were performed to establish Invana's new resource est
How many of the 300 new holes correlated with 2012's higher grade stats ?

PEA essentially reduced higher grades to lower grade capping.

2012 Grades Metallurgy
Sands - 0.748%  U
R Sands - 1.626% U
Gravels - 1.264% U

Catch it ?
2012 grades in metallurgy report ( chart below )
have no ( 0 ) right side of decimal
= wayyyyy higher grades

PEA grades
have the additional ( 0 ) right side of decimal point.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54008447293_ea3b7e7bd0_c.jpg


Tweaking these 4 subjects above...
Does make me wonder just how much better Ivana could be.


Not investment advice.
Just pointing out what stands out when comparing historical vs current.



Cheers....



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>