Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Blue Sky Uranium Corp V.BSK

Alternate Symbol(s):  BKUCF

Blue Sky Uranium Corp. is a uranium and vanadium exploration company. The Company controls more than 480,000 hectares with the potential for uranium resources in Rio Negro, Chubut, Neuquen, and Mendoza provinces. Its projects include the Amarillo Grande Project, the Sierra Colonia Project, the Tierras Coloradas Project, Cerro Parva Project, Corcovo Project, and Chihuidos Project. The Company's flagship Amarillo Grande Project is located in central Rio Negro province, in the Patagonia region of southern Argentina. The Corcovo Project is comprised of two adjacent exploration properties totaling approximately 20,000 ha at the northeastern edge of the Neuquen basin. The Chihuidos project is comprised of six exploration property units totaling almost 60,000 hectares located 60 kilometers (km) west of Anelo city. The Sierra Colonia project includes 100% ownership of more than 28,470 hectares in the central-eastern part of Chubut Province.


TSXV:BSK - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Sep 21, 2024 7:04pm
81 Views
Post# 36234985

ROUND 2 ( another run at pea costs )

ROUND 2 ( another run at pea costs )

Mine Costs + Course Back Filling ( present 1st line )
Mine Costs + Course Back Fill ( carry over same as 1st line - shown but not added in )
Processing Costs ( present 3rd line )

( 1st + 3rd cost figures ) i'll take another poke at - pea.
  25 million tonnes ( grnerous tonnage ) indicated and inferred

Mine Cost + Back Filling  ( pulls ore out + places waste ores back in )
25 million tonnes
x $2.09 per tonne
= $52,250,000 million

Processing
25,000,000 million tonnes
x 75% course rejects
= 18,750,000 million tonnes ( course rejects )
= 6,250,000 tonnes feed stock for processing

6,250,000 million tonnes  ( processing )
x $8.52 per tonne
= $$53,500,000  usd ( cost to process )

   Mine cost + Back Filling Course Rejects
+ Processing

= $105,750,000 million usd


Using figures above...
i'll recalculate pea costs



$52.250, 000 - .Mining costs incl course rejects
$53,500,000 - Processing
$  2,200,000 - Waste + Water
$45,000,000 - G & A
= $152,950,000 million ( total operating costs )

UNIT COST
since line 2 on chart below is a repeat of line one ( assumption )
i'll omit line 2 - $4.97 unit cost

Total Unit Costs
$15.50
- $4.97
= $10.53 ( total unit cost )


Could these revised figures be correct ...?
Suppose they were....
Ivana would be all the more profitable.

If course gravels / sub aquifers ------> contain uranium ?
All the more valuble.



After all.... mine process is simple...
Excavating ores near surface
0m - 30m.
No crushing No Milling
Wash and scrub ores
Place in carbonate acid
Dry finished product  - ship out

Suppose my figures were correct...
BSK .... could command far better jv terms.

Chime in if i've errored.
Provide your own take.

Gotta love the -/+ 35% pea buffer....lol
$363.7 million - PEA
$152.9 million - my guesstimate figures
= $210.8 million difference 60% buffer 

Advice ?
Test the gravels for uranium source.
If rhyolite limes come in contact with uranium bearing gravels...
Caustic limes would certainly precipitate uranium from gravel rocks.
Making it appears as.... calc limes is source vs actual gravels and sands.


Cheers.....


https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54010089946_c96c22850f_c.jpg

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>