RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:as usual patience is Mostlyserious wrote: I don't know how to interpret that statement. Had they done some testing on materials that exceeded 2000 cycles, then GEN1 and GEN2 iterations were a technical regression since their degradation was significant after only 150 cycles. If my understanding and interpretation is incorrect, then there is something to be said about how they write stuff because I certainly don't consider my comprehension and education as below average.
MAYBE,
SiOx Gen "0.5" was not a sufficient capacity improvement to NR it, but it's degradation being minimal
they continued the charge/discharge cycles.
Just a thought.
"Charge and discharge rates of a battery are governed by C-rates."
I found this interesting website.
What Is C-rate? It's informative.
TOCKY8008