RE:RE:RE:RE:THOUGHTS ON THE STARS ALIGNING FOR NANOTesla bought the Springpower patents for $3. Ridiculous! And would have had to research its alternative method on its own, without publishing anything to date (Jeff Dahn, the inventor of a new CAM process? Never heard of it. Which patent?).
To use this method for itself, perhaps. But to then be able to offer this CAM process to any other cathode manufacturer for free. Very generous, right? Don't they have anything else to do at Tesla?
Furthermore, every manufacturer, like Nano One Materials, would have had its own product, its own battery chemistry, which would have had to be tested with this "Tesla process" - and for years! We can see very clearly at Nano One Materials how long something like this takes when you work with over 20 companies, for example.
The whole Tesla process technology idea only works if you got a lot of important companies on board right from the start, years ago. Do you really believe that?
OK! For example, I could very well imagine Tesla working with BASF in Germany. It would make sense based on the location alone. But what would that mean? Tesla>BASF>Nano One Materials>Worley? The Tesla process at Stellantis in Canada? At Honda, Ford, SK on, EcoPro, GM, Samsung, VW, LG... Never, never! I think Tesla and Nano One Materials have been partners since day one. I think that's much more likely.
The Springpower patents are and were just a deception back then.
So sleep soundly in the near future!