Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Seabridge Gold Inc T.SEA

Alternate Symbol(s):  SA

Seabridge Gold Inc. is engaged in acquiring, exploring, and advancing mineral properties, with an emphasis on gold resources, located in Canada and the United States. The Company holds a 100% interest in several North American gold projects. Its principal assets, the KSM project, and its Iskut project, are located in Northwest British Columbia, Canada's Golden Triangle, the Courageous Lake project located in Canada's Northwest Territories, the Snowstorm project in the Getchell Gold Belt of Northern Nevada and the 3 Aces project set in the Yukon Territory. The KSM Project is an undeveloped gold project. Iskut is a 294 square kilometers property located approximately 20 kilometers (km) east of KSM. 3 Aces is a 314 square kilometer property located in southeastern Yukon. The project is a district-scale, orogenic gold project. Snowstorm is a 103 square kilometer property located at the intersection of three major Nevada gold belts. Grassy Mountain is its non-core asset.


TSX:SEA - Post by User

Comment by cskhurasuon Oct 19, 2024 10:44am
55 Views
Post# 36272981

RE:Quote from Rudi in 2020

RE:Quote from Rudi in 2020It seems to me that the source of the apparent conflict between TUD and SEA is that they have different views on what how far TUD has to go to prove the economic value of TC. SEA sees TC as an early stage exploration project while people on the TUD BB are calling it a mine as if it has reserves and permitted mine plans. 

The TC limitations Rudi has mentioned in his interview are the limitations exposed in TUD's own 43-101 disclosures. Can these limitations be overcome? I have no idea. But if they are overcome, Rudi says he is willing to change SEA's plans to accomodate TUD. That's how I understand it. This seems reasonable to me.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>