Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Baytex Energy Corp T.BTE

Alternate Symbol(s):  BTE

Baytex Energy Corp. is a Canada-based energy company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, development and production of crude oil and natural gas in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and in the Eagle Ford in the United States. Its crude oil and natural gas operations are organized into three main operating areas: Light Oil USA (Eagle Ford), Light Oil Canada (Pembina Duvernay / Viking) and Heavy Oil Canada (Peace River / Peavine / Lloydminster). Its Eagle Ford assets are located in the core of the liquids-rich Eagle Ford shale in South Texas. The Eagle Ford shale covers approximately 269,000 gross acres of crude oil operations. Its Viking assets are located in the Dodsland area in southwest Saskatchewan and in the Esther area of southeastern Alberta. It also holds 100% working interest land position in the East Duvernay resource play in central Alberta.


TSX:BTE - Post by User

Comment by JohnnyDoeon Oct 24, 2024 8:01pm
173 Views
Post# 36281295

RE:RE:BTE: Merger Medicine

RE:RE:BTE: Merger Medicine
AvInvestor wrote: Poorly written, using debt wisely can be an extremely useful tool for companies to succeed and grow. At present, the debt level is fine subject to the price of oil. Why not sell the heavy oil assets and use the proceeds to extinguish part of the debt and conduct more
buybacks? In effect, de-risking the business. 

The debt level is NOT fine. In historical terms, sure, the debt level is fine. In terms of being able to service the debt, the debt level is fine. In terms of current comparables, the debt level is not fine and the inability to make material progress against the debt after a year of 80 wti is why this thing is in the tank..

Seriously, we're looking at 5 years of 80 wti to hit the target debt and increase shareholder returns 

I know their presentations make claims about debt repayment at 70 wti, but that's complete BS given they have barely moved the needle at 80. What they've actually
achieved after a year of 80 suggests their projections at 70 are total BS. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>