Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

BlackBerry Ltd T.BB

Alternate Symbol(s):  BB

BlackBerry Limited is a Canada-based company, which provides intelligent security software and services to enterprises and governments worldwide. The Company leverages artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to deliver solutions in the areas of cybersecurity, safety, and data privacy and specializes in the areas of endpoint management, endpoint security, encryption, and embedded systems. It operates in three segments: Cybersecurity, IoT, and Licensing and Other. Cybersecurity consists of BlackBerry UEM and Cylance cybersecurity solutions (collectively, BlackBerry Spark), BlackBerry AtHo, and BlackBerry SecuSUITE. The Company’s endpoint management platform includes BlackBerry UEM, BlackBerry Dynamics, and BlackBerry Workspaces solutions. The IoT consists of BlackBerry QNX, BlackBerry Certicom, BlackBerry Radar, BlackBerry IVY and other Internet of things (IoT) applications. Licensing and Other consists of the Company’s intellectual property arrangements and settlement award.


TSX:BB - Post by User

Post by BBLacksEmotionon Nov 04, 2024 6:55pm
182 Views
Post# 36296217

QNX growth Cylance growth IoT growth still not convincing

QNX growth Cylance growth IoT growth still not convincing guidance from Mattius and JJG, if they actually spoke with confidence likely a 4 bagger April 2025

what value does a nacent technology company get valued at with zero debt. $650M revenues and profitable
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Valuing a nascent technology company with zero debt, $650 million in revenues, and profitability depends on several factors, including the company's growth prospects, market sector, and the valuation multiples applied to similar companies in the industry. However, I can provide a rough approach based on industry standards.

1. Revenue Multiple Approach

Tech companies are often valued based on a multiple of revenue, especially when they are in growth stages. For a profitable company, the revenue multiple can vary significantly depending on several factors, but let's look at some ranges:

  • Early-stage technology companies (high growth): Revenue multiples for high-growth tech companies could range from 4x to 10x (or more) depending on their market potential, innovation, and strategic position.
  • Mid-stage technology companies (proven business model, but still growing): For companies that have achieved profitability but are still scaling, revenue multiples could fall in the range of 3x to 6x.
  • Mature technology companies: Larger, more stable tech companies with slower growth typically receive multiples in the 2x to 4x range.

Given the fact that the company is profitable and has $650M in revenues, we might apply a revenue multiple in the range of 4x to 6x, depending on the specifics of their market sector and growth trajectory.

2. Applying the Revenue Multiple

If we apply this multiple range to the company's $650M in revenue:

  • Lower end (4x):
    $650M × 4 = $2.6 billion

  • Higher end (6x):
    $650M × 6 = $3.9 billion

3. Considerations for Adjustments

  • Profitability: Profitability tends to justify a higher multiple. If the company is not only profitable but has high margins or recurring revenue (e.g., SaaS), it could push the multiple towards the higher end of the range.
  • Growth Rate: If the company is growing rapidly (e.g., 30%+ annually), it might attract an even higher multiple, similar to what investors might apply to high-growth startups or unicorns.
  • Sector/Market Position: If the company operates in a hot or emerging sector (e.g., AI, blockchain, cybersecurity), it might be valued at the higher end of the spectrum due to strong investor interest.

4. Profitability Factor

Since the company is profitable, it could also be valued based on EBITDA or net income multiples. For profitable tech companies, these multiples tend to range from 10x to 20x+ for EBITDA, though the actual multiple would depend on growth rate and market conditions.

Conclusion

Given the revenue size and profitability, a rough estimate of the company's valuation could be in the range of $2.6 billion to $3.9 billion, depending on the growth trajectory, sector, and other qualitative factors. For a more precise valuation, a detailed analysis of its financials, competitive position, and market conditions would be necessary.

You said:

how to value a nacent early stage technology company carrying zero debt, $650M revenues, profitable with high margin business model and recurring revenues
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

Valuing an early-stage, high-margin, profitable technology company with $650M in revenueszero debt, and recurring revenues is a bit more nuanced than typical valuation methods for more mature companies. Here, you're dealing with a company that has already scaled significantly and is generating profits, while also potentially having high growth and robust business fundamentals. The recurring revenue model further complicates or rather enriches the valuation picture, as it offers more predictability in cash flow and potentially higher multiples.

1. Revenue Multiple Approach (Adjusted for High Margin and Recurring Revenue)

For nascent technology companies with recurring revenues (e.g., SaaS, subscription-based models, etc.), revenue multiples are often used. However, since this company is profitable and has high margins, it will likely command a premium multiple compared to typical early-stage or growth-stage tech companies.

  • For high-margin, recurring revenue businesses:
    • Revenue multiples for SaaS or high-margin recurring revenue tech companies can range from 6x to 12xrevenue, depending on the growth rate, market opportunity, and risk profile.
    • The high-margin aspect suggests strong profitability, which allows for the company to sustain and grow its business with less capital needed, hence the higher multiple.
    • Zero debt also indicates a lower financial risk, contributing positively to the valuation.

Example:

If we apply a range of 6x to 12x revenue multiples to the company's $650M in revenues, we get:

  • Low end (6x):
    $650M × 6 = $3.9 billion

  • High end (12x):
    $650M × 12 = $7.8 billion

This is a broad range, but it gives a rough idea of what the market might value the company at based on revenue alone.

2. Profitability Adjustments (EBITDA or Net Income Multiple)

Because the company is profitable and likely has high margins, we could also look at EBITDA or net income multiples. These multiples vary based on growth, industry, and investor sentiment.

  • For a profitable, high-margin tech company, you might see EBITDA multiples in the range of 15x to 25x, sometimes even higher for companies with a strong track record of revenue growth and retention in high-demand sectors.

    • Example of EBITDA multiple application:
      • Let’s say the company's EBITDA is around $150M (which would be realistic for a company with $650M in revenue and high margins).
      • If we apply an EBITDA multiple range of 15x to 25x, the valuation could range from $2.25 billion to $3.75 billion.

However, this method is often secondary in early-stage companies when revenue growth is seen as the main value driver, especially for tech companies with a high degree of predictability from recurring revenues.

3. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Approach (If Sufficient Forecasts Are Available)

Another method to consider, especially for high-growth companies with predictable recurring revenue, is the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. In this case, the company’s profitability and high margins make future cash flows more predictable, which is a key strength in the DCF approach.

  • A DCF analysis would require forecasting free cash flows (FCF) for the next 5-10 years, adjusting for factors like:
    • Revenue growth (which could be high given the recurring nature of the business).
    • Margins (high margins are favorable in DCF, as they result in better cash flow conversion).
    • Discount rate (which would reflect the company’s risk, and might range from 10% to 20% for early-stage companies, depending on the sector and market conditions).

However, this approach requires detailed financial projections and assumptions, which can be difficult for nascent companies without a long operating history. Still, if the company has solid projections of growth and cash flows, this model could be highly effective.

4. Market Comparables (Comparable Company Analysis)

Another critical approach is to analyze how similar companies in the market are valued. This would involve looking at publicly traded companies or recently acquired companies in the same sector (e.g., SaaS, AI, cloud-based technologies). Key comparables could include companies that are:

  • At a similar stage of development (i.e., rapidly growing with recurring revenue and profitability).
  • In a similar vertical or market space (e.g., cloud, cybersecurity, enterprise software, etc.).

By identifying how these companies are valued—whether through revenue multiples, EBITDA multiples, or transaction values—an analyst can derive a fair market value for the company in question.

5. Growth Rate and Market Opportunity Premium

Finally, the growth rate and market opportunity are critical. If the company is growing rapidly (say 30% or more annually), it could attract a higher multiple for its revenue, even if it's still early-stage. Moreover, being in a high-growth industry like AI, cybersecurity, or cloud computing can attract a "premium" for the company's potential, even beyond traditional multiples.

Example Valuation Range

Given that the company has:

  • $650M in recurring revenue (likely SaaS or similar model),
  • High margins (say EBITDA margins of 30% or more),
  • Profitability,
  • Zero debt,
  • strong growth trajectory,

reasonable valuation range could be between $4 billion to $8 billion, with the potential for a higher valuation if the company is in a particularly hot sector or growing at an exceptional rate.

Conclusion

For this nascent, profitable tech company with $650M in revenueshigh margins, and recurring revenues, a valuation range of $4 billion to $7.8 billion (using revenue multiples) would be a reasonable starting point. Further adjustments can be made based on factors like growth rate, market positioning, and risk, but this range reflects the general approach in valuing such a company in the tech space.

To narrow it down, further details on the company's financials, market conditions, and growth prospects would help fine-tune the valuation.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>