Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Blue Sky Uranium Corp V.BSK

Alternate Symbol(s):  BKUCF

Blue Sky Uranium Corp. is a uranium and vanadium exploration company. The Company controls more than 480,000 hectares with the potential for uranium resources in Rio Negro, Chubut, Neuquen, and Mendoza provinces. Its projects include the Amarillo Grande Project, the Sierra Colonia Project, the Tierras Coloradas Project, Cerro Parva Project, Corcovo Project, and Chihuidos Project. The Company's flagship Amarillo Grande Project is located in central Rio Negro province, in the Patagonia region of southern Argentina. The Corcovo Project is comprised of two adjacent exploration properties totaling approximately 20,000 ha at the northeastern edge of the Neuquen basin. The Chihuidos project is comprised of six exploration property units totaling almost 60,000 hectares located 60 kilometers (km) west of Anelo city. The Sierra Colonia project includes 100% ownership of more than 28,470 hectares in the central-eastern part of Chubut Province.


TSXV:BSK - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Nov 05, 2024 3:50am
55 Views
Post# 36296481

MOBILE URANIUM

MOBILE URANIUMEast Zone Drills
placement outside visual redox zone
drill program cut short
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54034899699_1164a839bb_b.jpg

Central Zone ( Sept 19 2019 )
32 of the planned 74
sampling of the initial 26 holes
26 holes were surveyed using a calibrated Mount Soupris
radiometric probe and radiometric anomalies were detected in a number of holes and at several different depths; some are open to depth.

The program also encountered reduced carbonaceous alteration and carnotite mineralization. Five sample pits were dug where carnotite was observed. Two of these, at IC-CAL-2019_001 exposed carnotite U-V mineralization related to caliche with a non-radiometric response, suggesting the mineralization is in disequilibrium and has recently been remobilized; in one of the sample pits the mineralization remained open to depth.

Samples for analysis were sent to Bureau Veritas Minerals of Mendoza, Argentina for preparation by drying, crushing to 80% passing 10 mesh and then pulverizing a 250g split to 95% passing 150 mesh.

Pulps are being sent to Bureau Veritas Commodities Canada Ltd. for analysis of 45 elements by means of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) following a four-acid digestion (MA-200).

https://blueskyuranium.com/news-releases/blue-sky-uranium-reports-positive-geophysics-survey-and-exploration-results-at-the-amarillo-grande-uranium-vanadium-project/

Issue ?
Central Zone assay results not reported.
Seen on map in pink - lower ledger.
https://blueskyuranium.com/site/assets/files/5996/figure_1__all_ivanas_sectors.jpg

NOTE - map ^ ^ reveals west bluffs would fall inside Ivana claims boundary.

Second Issue ?
Central zone tested the lower elevation of basin.
Water path.
Uranium results would be prone to dilution. ( watered down, calcite, water buffers  )

Central Zone press release ( above ) mentions "
alteration and carnotite, related to caliche with a non-radiometric response,
suggesting the mineralization is in disequilibrium and has recently been remobilized

Water
Calcium  ( caliche )
= best uranium blockers besides - lead.

Testing the soils ( water path ) above Picos Salar @ central zone
= water path feeds Picos
= uranium would be in a mobile state / altered
= altered state requires diff testing since calcium and water act as blockers of radiation.
= mobility ..... Picos piques my interest all the more.

In fact.... spanish report mentions in so many words...
would Ivana's watershed below continue to oxidize the uranium ?
Answer was....yes.

West Bluffs significant oxidation but veered from
East Bluffs  significant redox but drills were outside redox
Bluffs           dump into Picos and Ivana
Central         tested water path above picos = proving mobility
Spanish       continue to convert / underground watershed
Reads as.... Picos Radio Nucleide ( uranyl ) Brine Mining


East Zone Redox Area
smaller inset map
green zone on smaller inset map is redox zone
= yellow dots inside redox zone
= 500 - 23,734 cps ( counts per second )    lol
= vp of exploration allergic to testing visable redox

Purple rock ranges on East Bluffs redoxing
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54035213376_6157b788ac_b.jpg

Why not a rounded number ?
Was it 23,734 cps ?   


Again...
i like this map
it shows it would  include west bluffs with nearly 10 km of redox.
https://blueskyuranium.com/site/assets/files/5996/figure_1__all_ivanas_sectors.jpg


Did a bit of reading up on - uranium and water
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-66462-3
uranium will react with water exothermal
bond to hydrogen and debatable on....releases a gas UH3
remaining uranium reacts with waters oxygen
creating uranium oxide

Picos Salar and Indio
could very well have - uranyls, uranium oxide silt beds
uranium oxide in Ivana at depth could have emminated from - Picos


1.5 km SW stepout = Maria
Just how good is this Maria zone ?

  • 1,881 ppm U3O8 & 640 ppm V2O5 over 2.0 m at AGI-CAL103,
    • Including 3,404 ppm (0.34%) U3O8 and 1,335 ppm (0.13%) V2O5 over 0.8 m
  • 1,390 ppm U3O8 & 650 ppm V2O5 over 1.6 m at AGI-CAL56,
    • Including 2,332 ppm (0.23%) U3O8 and 1,016 ppm (0.10%) V2O5 over 0.7 m
  • 610 ppm U3O8 & 384 ppm V2O5 over 1.6 m at AGI-CAL58,
    • Including 1,070 ppm (0.10%) U3O8 and 555 ppm (0.05%) V2O5 over 0.4 m
  • 486 ppm U3O8 & 298 ppm V2O5 over 2.0 m at AGI-CAL78,
    • Including 1,206 ppm (0.12%) U3O8 and 589 (0.06%) ppm V2O5 over 0.6 m

Analytical results have now been received for total of 115 pits completed

https://blueskyuranium.com/news-releases/blue-sky-uranium-pit-sampling-results-continue-to-expand-mineralization-adjacent-to-ivana-uranium-vanadium-deposit/


Inside Ivana's U shaped deposit
= pink
= basement
https://blueskyuranium.com/site/assets/files/5996/2023_0306_figure_2_3d_geological_modeling_section.png

Smaller map scale = 4km = ivana would ring at = 5km length
vs other maps ivana's U shape rings in at 6.5 km ( following entire U incl outlier )
Right side map
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54042594726_be449d6e24_b.jpg

Today i rescanned Ivana's west and east bluffs and atop ivana
purple and green rocks at surface everywhere even at depth
east bluffs massive mounds redoxing
west zone even has the rocks at depth
9.23 km west bluff could extend even further toward gut
middle gut dark purple going north - massive purple rock fault ?

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54113378765_eb65239476_b.jpg


More i study Armarillo, more i like it.
upper west and east bluffs were not given a fair shake.

central  zone ( water path ) requires diff testing of mobile uranium factoring water + calcium
as buffers / nuetralizers - diff testing is needed. Maybe why bsk had issues with mendoza lab ?

Loose rock processing study
Hardrock basement spanish report.
How to correct 298 mil shares out - shareholder value ?

Provide 3 resources
sand resource under 1 um
loose rock processing report over 1 um / milling
Salar testing, silts brines, confirm maria hardrock.


Cheers.....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4BdRXT0VGM

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>