MOBILE URANIUMEast Zone Drills placement outside visual redox zone
drill program cut short
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54034899699_1164a839bb_b.jpg Central Zone ( Sept 19 2019 ) 32 of the planned 74
sampling of the initial 26 holes
26 holes were surveyed using a calibrated Mount Soupris
radiometric probe and radiometric anomalies were detected in a number of holes and at several different depths; some are open to depth.
The program also encountered reduced carbonaceous alteration and carnotite mineralization. Five sample pits were dug where carnotite was observed. Two of these, at IC-CAL-2019_001 exposed carnotite U-V mineralization related to
caliche with a non-radiometric response, suggesting the mineralization is in
disequilibrium and has recently been remobilized; in one of the sample pits the mineralization remained open to depth.
Samples for analysis were sent to Bureau Veritas Minerals of
Mendoza, Argentina for preparation by drying, crushing to 80% passing 10 mesh and then pulverizing a 250g split to 95% passing 150 mesh.
Pulps are being sent to
Bureau Veritas Commodities Canada Ltd. for analysis of 45 elements by means of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) following a four-acid digestion (MA-200).
https://blueskyuranium.com/news-releases/blue-sky-uranium-reports-positive-geophysics-survey-and-exploration-results-at-the-amarillo-grande-uranium-vanadium-project/
Issue ? Central Zone assay results
not reported. Seen on map in
pink - lower ledger.
https://blueskyuranium.com/site/assets/files/5996/figure_1__all_ivanas_sectors.jpg NOTE -
map ^ ^ reveals west bluffs would fall inside Ivana claims boundary.
Second Issue ? Central zone tested the lower elevation of basin.
Water path.
Uranium results would be prone to dilution. ( watered down, calcite, water buffers )
Central Zone press release ( above ) mentions "
alteration and carnotite, related to caliche with a non-radiometric response, suggesting the mineralization is in disequilibrium and has recently been remobilized Water
Calcium ( caliche )
= best uranium blockers besides - lead. Testing the soils ( water path ) above Picos Salar @ central zone
= water path feeds Picos
= uranium would be in a mobile state / altered
= altered state requires diff testing since calcium and water act as blockers of radiation.
= mobility ..... Picos piques my interest all the more.
In fact.... spanish report mentions in so many words...
would Ivana's watershed below continue to oxidize the uranium ?
Answer was....yes.
West Bluffs significant oxidation but veered from
East Bluffs significant redox but drills were outside redox
Bluffs dump into Picos and Ivana
Central tested water path above picos = proving mobility
Spanish continue to convert / underground watershed
Reads as.... Picos Radio Nucleide ( uranyl ) Brine Mining East Zone Redox Area smaller inset map
green zone on smaller inset map is redox zone
= yellow dots inside redox zone = 500 - 23,734 cps ( counts per second ) lol = vp of exploration allergic to testing visable redox
Purple rock ranges on East Bluffs redoxing
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54035213376_6157b788ac_b.jpg Why not a rounded number ? Was it 23,734 cps ?
Again... i like this map
it shows it would include west bluffs with nearly 10 km of redox.
https://blueskyuranium.com/site/assets/files/5996/figure_1__all_ivanas_sectors.jpg Did a bit of reading up on - uranium and water https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-66462-3 uranium will react with water exothermal
bond to hydrogen and debatable on....releases a gas UH3
remaining uranium reacts with waters oxygen
creating uranium oxide
Picos Salar and Indio could very well have - uranyls, uranium oxide silt beds
uranium oxide in Ivana at depth could have emminated from - Picos
1.5 km SW stepout = Maria Just how good is this Maria zone ?
- 1,881 ppm U3O8 & 640 ppm V2O5 over 2.0 m at AGI-CAL103,
- Including 3,404 ppm (0.34%) U3O8 and 1,335 ppm (0.13%) V2O5 over 0.8 m
- 1,390 ppm U3O8 & 650 ppm V2O5 over 1.6 m at AGI-CAL56,
- Including 2,332 ppm (0.23%) U3O8 and 1,016 ppm (0.10%) V2O5 over 0.7 m
- 610 ppm U3O8 & 384 ppm V2O5 over 1.6 m at AGI-CAL58,
- Including 1,070 ppm (0.10%) U3O8 and 555 ppm (0.05%) V2O5 over 0.4 m
- 486 ppm U3O8 & 298 ppm V2O5 over 2.0 m at AGI-CAL78,
- Including 1,206 ppm (0.12%) U3O8 and 589 (0.06%) ppm V2O5 over 0.6 m
Analytical results have now been received for total of 1
15 pits completed https://blueskyuranium.com/news-releases/blue-sky-uranium-pit-sampling-results-continue-to-expand-mineralization-adjacent-to-ivana-uranium-vanadium-deposit/
Inside Ivana's U shaped deposit = pink
= basement
https://blueskyuranium.com/site/assets/files/5996/2023_0306_figure_2_3d_geological_modeling_section.png Smaller map scale = 4km = ivana would ring at = 5km length
vs other maps ivana's U shape rings in at 6.5 km ( following entire U incl outlier )
Right side map
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54042594726_be449d6e24_b.jpg Today i rescanned Ivana's west and east bluffs and atop ivana purple and green rocks at surface everywhere even at depth
east bluffs massive mounds redoxing
west zone even has the rocks at depth
9.23 km west bluff could extend even further toward gut
middle gut dark purple going north - massive purple rock fault ?
More i study Armarillo, more i like it.
upper west and east bluffs were not given a fair shake.
central zone ( water path ) requires diff testing of mobile uranium factoring water + calcium
as buffers / nuetralizers - diff testing is needed. Maybe why bsk had issues with mendoza lab ?
Loose rock processing study
Hardrock basement spanish report.
How to correct 298 mil shares out - shareholder value ?
Provide 3 resources sand resource under 1 um
loose rock processing report over 1 um / milling
Salar testing, silts brines, confirm maria hardrock.
Cheers.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4BdRXT0VGM