Not going down your rabbit hole, budRecent post is obviously designed to pull in to rabbit hole that nobody would ever want to visit.
Do you think this deliberate ego fixation by the other, who is clearly trying to escalate and entice by using incorrect and incomplete language is somehow meant to entrap? I mean, it's all there for anyone who wants to read and see very clearly the evidence of how the current operators act and acted. They missed the ethics module.
For example we could spend hours discussing the Covid tactic employed by the company, more than once to move the dates of the AGM. There were countless......countless companies who were able to use zoom or lumi for their annual meetings. No delays were necessary for them! We could also talk about the weak tactic of lawsuits against the wind ( meant to defame) and the answer of counter lawsuits. The copious and shocking amounts of cash spent on how many lawyer/accounting types doing a forensic, I repeat FORENSIC audit which came up EMPTY of any wrongdoings!! Pigs.
I am starting to question this rabbit hole tactic which is obviously deflect, deny, dpivot but would look a little farther into it. My hair has been standing up for awhile now. Maybe there is a deliberate attempt to keep the share price low to attract a big low ball bidder. If successful they would benefit with change of control payouts and/or the big piggy omnibus plan. Now, that would be enough to set off an interesting shareholder lawsuit case, no? Keeping the share price deliberately low is hard to prove but I do wonder when odd volumes and anonymous shows up.