RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Ten 2 go …!My issue is management has a responsability to inform investors of material information. Like necessary trial enrollment.
It's not a big ask, this is 101 stuff.
If they have been told- your trial now needs 159 patients for the FDA to see it as final- investors need to be informed of that both timely and clearly.
None of us know what this trial needs to be fully enrolled. Normal?
Also, if they counted 6 patients- but those patients were rejected by some oversight- that information should also be defined for investors.
Kellum spent more time talking about the maternity leave of someone we don't know- than important investor information.
I agree that this may just be a time and money set back, but management doesn't get to decide to hold back basic material info. And as we've seen with this group in the past they would rather run from bad news than be forthright. (Dialco)