RE:RE:RE:RE:French Military So you believe that all companies rely on one type of technology or supplier for critical materials and equipment?
In this case you seem to think that all the NATO members are waiting to see how this French testing will pan out for their own battery needs?
We can agree to disagree, and you can ignore trying to figure out why the SP is where it is. You don't have to believe what every business person knows, but BT is talking about Nanograf and US DOD in the interview and putting a few braincells to work, that will address what you consider "gibberish". BTW, US DOD has committed over US$40 million to Nanograf during their exploratory journey. I missed the amount that HPQ is getting from the French for this.
And in relation to the last interview, did you catch the statement from BT that it is "ridiculous" to assume anyone in R and D will be batting 1000? Hmmmm....setting expectation properly like they should have been before disrupting so many industries? Did you catch his thought that $260K is the "right" amount for the patent that supposedly will disrupt one of the most important industries? Hmmmm....$260k for something disrupting markets in 10s of billions and likely more. Hmmmm. And him going on Agoracom as something new....does anyone know why PYR stopped that years ago? And I appreciate his clarification that he gives Agoracom a call a day in advance but "after market hours". You bet that that is the way it should be otherwise he is improperly sharing insider information. Lots of funny things that usually get funnier at some point in the future looking back.
have a great day, eh. Don't worry about this investment, it will unwind over time as development continues.