Cura..Copied from stocktwitsGrasping at straws here, but is it possible that with a new pro-rescheduling DEA administrator, we wouldn't even need the hearings to resume? I remember that the hearings themselves are not a required step of the rule-making process, and it was at the DEA's discretions to hold them in the first place. It was fully within their power to forego the proceedings and enact the rule directly. After a regime change, would a new administrator have the power to scrap the hearings altogether and enact the rule? The optics would certainly make sense, snuffing out the kangaroo court corruption allegations, and demonstrating possibly the first example of government efficiency in the Trump administration. The setup is there. Does anyone know if it's a viable pathway?