RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Going syntheticWarrant Officer,
Perhaps management should undertake specific actions which demonstrate a willingness to do as you suggested.
For some graphite material processed Northern Graphite Corporation would be bringing in more revenue per specific customer; and yet, any increased income would be negatively offset due to much higher expenditures undertaken and all existing obligations relating to necessarily servicing the debt owed to creditors, payments to "Sprott" that are in arrears.
Were this company in an enviable position - as opposed to NGC currently being in a position of envying the advanced positioning of other actually SCPG manufacturing integrating graphite companies -, NGC.V shareholders would be experiencing the sustained positive impacts of share price appreciation.
Sure the share price has somewhat relatively recovered a wee bit of what's been lost; it's simply not enough.
We are going to see whether the suggestions put forth here with respect to "the Donald's incoming U.S. import tariff policy for China exported graphite and SCPG anode component materials especially, does result in Northern Graphite somehow actually getting it's due and the share price being made to fully recover to previous share price highs.
The dumping specifically of said battery component materials into not just the U.S. supply chain, specifically the most pejorative impacts on would be North American graphite miners and obviously the only existing graphite miner within North America, must be met with and dealt a specially imposed U.S. anti-dumping tariff that would be sustained for a heck of a lot more than just 4 years, this no matter what the negotiations on trade amongst China and the U.S. yield during such a four year period.
Such an anti-dumping tariff has got to be high enough to actually hurt China for no less than 4 years and such an action must be accompanied by an at minimum $100 Billion in long term U.S. Government supports for not only the most advanced U.S. based critical elements bearing lands developing and would be mining companies. Clearly such level of accompanying support must be made to extend, in a certain way, shape or form, into aggressively supporting the critical elements bearing lands development and mining industry players domiciled within Canada and Mexico; and the governments of both Canada and Mexico would do well to aggressively negotiate their respective way into ensuring this incoming Donald J.Trump administration would accomplish precisely that, amongst many other negotiated benefits for both Canada and Mexico as well.
By the way, we don't have to worry about the U.S. benefiting more in all this undertaking.
After all, the U.S. always benefits immensely more. The U.S. benefiting immensely more is thought by not only the incoming U.S. Secretary of State as being simply integral to the "rules based order" that Marco Rubio recently went yammering on about when speaking about China trade policy and China's current dominating status.