RE:RE:RE:RE:Hole 79You can adjust his assumptions as you see fit. It's a simple model. Where's yours? I was not commenting on the accuracy of all the assumptions, only that I liked the model and fwiw, I prefer a NPV model to a "in situ" model. What part of production out past 20 years has little value in a NPV model is wrong? In the context of the extensive 30km of drilling contracted for H12025, plus the additional drilling 30km drilling in H2. IF , and yes it's a big IF, there is enough core data to demonstrate the assumptions in his model, my point is why keep drilling? It doesn't add much value anyway. You've got all we need. Spend it elsewhere. Not on a diamond property in Africa or copper in the Andes. Not buying other juniors. If they can't find something highly productive, give the money back is what I'm saying. What's wrong about that concept ? The odds of them having excess cash is remote so what are you arguing about? We should all get a much better picture in the next few months. Sooner the better.