Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Claude Res Inc CLGRF

"Claude Resources Inc is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of gold and other precious metal properties. Its projects include Seabee Property and various exploration properties located at Laonil Lake. It also owns Amisk Gold Property."

GREY:CLGRF - Post Discussion

Claude Res Inc > blah blah blah
View:
Post by gog on Dec 14, 2012 1:20pm

blah blah blah

You're all talking like you're bankers which you're not. There is only one reason why anyone lends money and thats to make money, simple as that. Yes Claude has been a dog for a while but I would sure as heck fund it before an exploration play. Dec is obviously not a production miner, accidents like you describe are extremely rare and would not be weighted enough to come into play. Possibly this is the best way for a change in management from a mining perspective? I've said it before, they really screwed up the Madsen play by trying to mine on their own when the HG zone was being developed. You can't see the contacts at MAdsen and dilution killed them as well as not havin a proper team in place. They went cheap and got burned.

 

To even imply walking from Mdsen is ridiculous and shows your lack of knowledge. Banks are buying physical gold, not companies, when that is all gone (real soon) then producers will be next on the list with pure exploration plays a thing of the past. I love this SP and hope it drifts even lower but based on assets its more than undervalued. I personally will play this for 10% gains until it breaks out again. An incredible opportunity regardless of what any of us think about the company.............................just wished I could buy it, "one mine" and all. LOL

Comment by goldminerpulse on Dec 14, 2012 1:51pm
gog, you make a very good point when you say "...but I would sure as heck fund it [CRJ] before an exploration play." In fact when you look at production ranking, Claude stands out very nicely relative to many other producers. The TSX/TSXv average growth in production, unadjusted for dilution from share growth, is a mere 2% per year on a rolling 4Q basis (see www.goldminerpulse.com ...more  
Comment by December3 on Dec 14, 2012 11:05pm
SERIOUSLY???? . >>>>but I would sure as heck fund it before an exploration play.<<<< . Gotta love BB logic!  LOL!  This is the blind leading the blind, huddled together supporting each other - or is it the Company sending its geniuses to argue its case on the BB?  Nah, company insiders can't be this clueless. . What we were talking about was Banks loaning ...more  
Comment by December3 on Dec 14, 2012 11:21pm
>>>>Dec is obviously not a production miner, accidents like you describe are extremely rare and would not be weighted enough to come into play.<<<< . Obviously gob isn't a loan officer at a major bank, nor a production miner.  Mining is a risky business.  Things happen underground that not even the best managers can anticipate and when they do happen they can ...more  
Comment by December3 on Dec 14, 2012 11:30pm
>>>>I've said it before, they really screwed up the Madsen play by trying to mine on their own when the HG zone was being developed. You can't see the contacts at MAdsen and dilution killed them as well as not havin a proper team in place. They went cheap and got burned.<<<<< . Do you really believe this?  If you do, it is more evidence that the management ...more  
Comment by December3 on Dec 14, 2012 11:55pm
Wow!  More guys grasping at straws to defend their "investment" in CRJ!  What silly claims... .....if this is any indication of the depth of analysis available on your website, then it appears you didn't do yourself much good by posting here as the level of  understanding demonstrated appears to make the site be a solid "pass"! . >>>>In fact when ...more  
Comment by goldminerpulse on Dec 16, 2012 12:45pm
  December3, Thank-you for the comments!! I ask for comments and you delivered -- I value the contrary comments the most. So thanks for being frank. You ask "Do you guys make this stuff up? " to which I have to plead GUILTY. I did make up the production growth ranking metric. But the ideas behind it aren't mine. Rather I'm using the ideas from Frank Holmes and Nick ...more  
Comment by goldminerpulse on Dec 16, 2012 3:33pm
  I can name you 11 companies that have plans to increase production by 200% or more (max is 550%) by 2016, while CRJ's plans are only a growth of 66%.  In fact, CRJ ranks 21st on a list of "planned growth".   December3, Investing on the basis of plans is fine if that is your thing but comparing to my production growth metric is less than fair. Just look at the Nick ...more  
Comment by clestor on Dec 16, 2012 7:49pm
Nick Holland's presentation is very good . . . https://www.brrmedia.com/event/100137/nick-holland-the-ceo-of-gold-fields
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities