Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Global 8 Environmental Technologies Inc GBLE

GREY:GBLE - Post Discussion

Global 8 Environmental Technologies Inc > Another Failed Tactic of Wolf
View:
Post by danielwolfe00 on Sep 09, 2010 3:08pm

Another Failed Tactic of Wolf

Birds of a feather flock together, I guess that's why they both had the same sun glasses on in court that day and both used their child support money to pay for the trip instead of diapers? or Are they just hollywood wanta b's?
 
According to an 8-K filed by the Company on May 10, 2010, the Company dismissed Gruber & Company and engaged Richard Hawkins as the Company’s independent accountant on May 9, 2010. The Company’s engagement of Mr. Hawkins was twenty-nine days after Mr. Hawkins’ accounting license was suspended by the California Board of Accountancy due to Mr. Hawkins’ failure to pay child support.  Mr. Hawkins’ license remained suspended until it was reinstated on or about July 19, 2010.  The Solicitation Participants do not believe it is prudent to engage an independent accountant that manages his personal finances in a manner that threatens his ability to deliver audit opinions on behalf of the Company.  In addition, Mr. Hawkins failed to disclose the status of his license to the Company and to the Court when requesting the Court to order the plaintiff shareholders to pay Mr. Hawkins $30,000 to perform certain audit services. The Solicitation Participants believe the Company can locate more qualified and ethical independent auditor to serve the Company and, therefore, recommend a vote AGAINST the ratification of the appointment of Mr. Hawkins as the Company’s independent accountant.

Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities