Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF

GREY:IPHAF - Post Discussion

Isotechnika Pharma Inc > FDA request for further data
View:
Post by player121 on Apr 30, 2010 12:22pm

FDA request for further data

I think we need to remember that when Lux received fast track status back in August 2007 it was for the following reasons (directly from the news release):

The FDA based its decision on the following reasons:

    -   ISA247 is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition, namely non-infectious posterior, intermediate and panuveitis, and
    -   ISA247 demonstrates the potential to address medical needs unmet by available treatments for non-infectious posterior, intermediate and panuveitis.

Further...Fast Track designation will provide various means to expedite the development and review of ISA247. The process could be facilitated through meetings and other correspondence with the FDA reviewers, consideration for
priority review, and the ability to submit portions of the New Drug Application (NDA) early for review as part of a "rolling" submission.


Personally, I think it is highly UNLIKELY that they will request additional data given that they have had access to data for almost three years now.  Just my opinion.

Comment by WASKERWISK on Apr 30, 2010 2:18pm
Player, TeeVee is a disingenuous, intellectually dishonest flake.  It is also very weird that he continues to post here.  Creepy weird.Anyway, FDA obviously doesn’t give priority review to drugs where its probable that the priority will be a waste of time.  Obviously also, if the median approval time for priority review is 6 months (it varies but it is around there) and if FDA's ...more  
Comment by Plato5 on May 01, 2010 6:22am
Thanks for the teevee "creepy weird" characterization. That really does hit the nail on the head. Teevee's posts are like that. The personality behind those missives is impossible to imagine. It's the sort of personality I'd be terrified to be around in a crisis. It's dark, and deeply disturbing. Fortunately, we are discussing here only a Stock and not the ills of ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities