Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF

GREY:IPHAF - Post Discussion

Isotechnika Pharma Inc > WHY DIDN'T DR.LAUNA ASK FOR HALT?
View:
Post by ISAloser247 on Jun 25, 2010 10:02am

WHY DIDN'T DR.LAUNA ASK FOR HALT?



..............a day after hitting new high. on large volume,  ISA releases significant NR from FDA, without having

all the information.    Many,  who"know nothing" , just  " happen to exit their positions". the day  before the release.
I'm sure IF THIS CR#^  happened in any place, other than Alberta, there would

be at least some kind of Inquiry.

Is it any wonder , WHY THE FDA HAS OUTSTANDING ISSUES?


Comment by Wolfpack1 on Jun 25, 2010 11:59am
I agree they should have halted instead of making announcement 10 minutes before market opened. It is very suspicious that people dumped most of there holdings days before this NR was made, especially with the way it was announced.  Some serious questions need to be asked of insiders.
Comment by antoninus on Jun 25, 2010 12:22pm
I seem to remember way back when and even recently, people seemed pissed at me for suggesting that perhaps things could be managed more effectively?hmmmmmm....I feel vindicated and NOT at all happy about it. After what? 9 yrs and things like this event still plague us? I agree that a halt should have been requested in order to give proper time to issue a proper and calming news release. That said, ...more  
Comment by culater on Jun 25, 2010 1:16pm
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't the volume of selling now about equal to the volume of speculated buying just prior to the news.  Speculators were anticipating good news for a short term profit and the news didn't materialize as expected.  No one really nows why the delay, according to the posts and articles, even the people at ISA and Lux.  So why would we guess, one way ...more  
Comment by throughmud on Jun 25, 2010 2:02pm
They weren't pissed at you about your comments about management or lack there of because most normal folk would be wondering the same thing. It was your constant reiterative harping about it. In that, it definitely remains to be seen whether you will be exonerated.mud
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities