Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Golden Predator Mining Corp. NTGSF

Golden Predator Mining Corp. is a well-financed gold exploration company focused on its high-grade orogenic gold-in-quartz 3 Aces Project in Canada’s Yukon. With proven management and an experienced technical team, the Company is well positioned for growth.

OTCQX:NTGSF - Post Discussion

Golden Predator Mining Corp. > 3 May: Viva voting regarding GPY-VIVA combination
View:
Post by stanjs on May 02, 2021 2:27pm

3 May: Viva voting regarding GPY-VIVA combination

3 May, 2pm Vancouver time: voting
5 May: combination takes effect if no delays. If any delays, may only take effect on 15 May. 

James Hesketh (Viva CEO) who currently provide mine consulting services to GPY, will become CEO of GPY.

After reading the combination proposal, I came to the conclusion, GPY has the mine but not the expertise, has to contract someone like Hesketh. Nobody wants to buy Viva's Tonopah project except GPY. Viva could have gone it alone, but their future financing would continue to be very dilutive for their current management who are also shareholders. 

Viva management was invited to join GPY and advance both mines together. It is a great arrangement technicially for GPY technically and financially for Viva. 

Hesketh is the real asset: the expertise to advance GPY's Brewery Creek mine to production. I think Sheriff would be too busy with his main project, Encore Energy to handle Brewery Creek mine.
Comment by satchmo6 on May 02, 2021 9:54pm
some delays to incorporate a new extraction process   vis;  https://youtu.be/PPxW-poS-jY
Comment by stanjs on May 03, 2021 10:06am
Combination cancelled! Pros: no share dilution.  Cons: Sheriff has to do more heavy lifting to advance Brewery Creek mine to production?
Comment by Freezerburn on May 03, 2021 10:39am
Hey! They didn't do a trading halt. 
Comment by wreckles on May 03, 2021 12:20pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by dollardaze on May 03, 2021 12:01pm
Who pays who the $300k break fee?
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities