Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Big Banc Split Corp T.BNK

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.BNK.PR.A

The investment objectives for the Preferred Shares are to provide their holders with fixed cumulative preferential monthly cash distributions in the amount of $0.05 per Preferred Share ($0.60 per annum or 6.0% per annum on the issue price of $10.00 per Preferred Share) until November 30, 2023 (the Maturity Date) and to return the original issue price of $10.00 to holders on the Maturity Date... see more

TSX:BNK - Post Discussion

Big Banc Split Corp > Globe & Mail Article
View:
Post by retiredcf on Mar 23, 2016 7:50am

Globe & Mail Article

In addition, there were a couple of block trades yesterday where NA purchased 80K shares from a TD client @ $1.79 and a Canaccord client purchased 83K shares from a RBC client @ $1.80. Once again, signs that this deal will close. GLTA


Bankers Petroleum Ltd

com

BNK

1.79

80,000

n.a.

TD Securities Inc.

09:32

 

 

 

 

1.80

83,000

Canaccord Genuity Corp.

RBC Capital Markets

09:39

 

 

Chinese buyers still on the hunt for Canadian energy

ATH.TSX, SHI.NYS, PTR.NYS, BNK.TSX
 

Remember the fear about China taking over all of Canada's energy companies? It was just half a decade ago, but it seems like a quaint misunderstanding of a long-gone era.

China's still a buyer, though, as one deal showed this week. The difference is transactions are on a smaller scale and at a slower pace.
 

Its major state oil companies spent the early part of this century bringing armfuls of cash across the Pacific to spend on Canadian oil assets.
 

Mega-deals and joint ventures were commonplace, from PetroChina's $1.9-billion purchase of a stake in Athabasca Oil to Sinopec's $4.7-billion (U.S.) acquisition of ConocoPhillips's interest in Syncrude Canada.
 

The idea at the time was China would pay any price to secure oil reserves, with the expectation that the country's economic growth would keep ballooning each year at double-digit rates.

The topper was CNOOC's $15.1-billion takeover of Nexen in 2012, which sent the federal government into anxiety fits and prompted the Harper Conservatives to formulate new rules to stop the foreign absorption of the oil sands - after they wooed the investments in the first place.

Since then, China's had a rough run in energy, from operational mishaps, such as a spill and a deadly explosion at Nexen's Long Lake oil sands project, to corruption probes at home that forced executives out of their jobs and, finally, to the painful collapse of crude prices.
 

It's all sent the biggest state-controlled companies into retrenchment. Making money in the oil sands was tough even with oil at $100 a barrel, owing to the many financial and technical things that can go wrong. At less than $40 a barrel, it's much more of a struggle.
 

But don't look now; deals are being done. In fact, Chinese firms have been buying right through the downturn. A big difference between this era and the previous one is the buyers are not household names. Shanghai-listed Geo-Jade Petroleum's $575-million (Canadian) friendly takeover of Bankers Petroleum, announced last weekend, is a prime example.
 

The $2.20-a-share cash bid represents a premium of nearly 100 per cent from Bankers' closing price on Friday, although the stock is well down from a year ago.
 

Okay, Bankers operates in Albania rather than Alberta but it's a Calgary-based deal for Geo-Jade, which has not made a lot of noise here despite a market capitalization of $3.6-billion and operations in Asia and North America.
 

Sinoenergy Pacific of Beijing has made two Canadian acquisitions in less than a year. It paid $170-million for privately held New Star Energy last summer and, this year, closed a $100-million takeover of debt-burdened Long Run Exploration.
 

Other recent buyers include China Oil and Gas Group and Yanchang Petroleum International.

That's a decent volume of business following Ottawa's tightened foreign investment rules. Those were aimed ostensibly at blocking foreign state-owned enterprises from buying up control of the oil sands, but the policy created uncertainty among a range of potential buyers with designs on other energy operations.
 

The most recent acquisitions have been very deliberate. The Geo-Jade deal will not likely run afoul of Canadian investment rules due to the foreign assets and the pledge to maintain the corporate and technical headquarters in Calgary. The others have price tags that fall below Investment Canada's threshold for the most stringent reviews. None of the deals involve the oil sands. Instead, these are purchases of conventional oil and gas operations.
 

China's economy has slowed, but it hasn't stopped. Early this month, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang delivered his annual work report, estimating the country's gross domestic product will to grow 6.5 per cent to 7 per cent this year. Foreign investment is expected to increase 10 per cent to $130-billion (U.S.).
 

Not all of that is energy related, of course, but if the energy industry is in the early stages of a recovery, that can only spell more interest in buying some of the many Canadian assets on the auction block.
 

Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:54 EDT

Comment by braincloud on Mar 23, 2016 8:15am
What the eff does this have to do with the price of tea in China?. Those trades that you suggest as indicators that the deal will close is also bull sheit. It just means that one guy doesn't believe it closes and another does! Don't be an idiot!
Comment by retiredcf on Mar 23, 2016 3:59pm
braincloud - I've been out all day so just saw your remarks. Thanks for the compliment and your brilliant analysis. A couple of points: 1. Block trades are just small pieces in a large puzzle. But this wasn't a $500 punt. If there were lots of doubts, people would have trouble selling blocks at $1.80. If you weren't sure of the deal, would you ante up close to $150K as did both NA and ...more  
Comment by LordIskander on Mar 23, 2016 4:34pm
Nope, i read the Purchase Arrangement. The Albanian Tax Dispute can be settled by Bankers without prior written consent of Geo-Jade. Whatever its outcome it is not considered Material Adverse Effect. Meaning: Geo Jade does not care for the audit of 2011. They will probably trade what is due to Bankers for excise/VAT tax refunds of which Albania owes more than $57MM and Bankers has own in courts ...more  
Comment by retiredcf on Mar 24, 2016 7:11am
LordIskander - What you say makes sense. My point was more general in nature in that while the Albanians were willing to impose punitive taxes on a small Canadian company, they are unlikely to do the same thing (ie. a second time) to a Chinese company. GLTA
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities