Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Concordia Healthcare Corp. T.CXR.R

TSX:CXR.R - Post Discussion

Concordia Healthcare Corp. > Greenhill & Co
View:
Post by CNInvesting on May 03, 2016 9:56am

Greenhill & Co

Actavis, Teva, Abbvie, GSK, etc. Those are a few names that Greenhill worked with on M&A matters, among other things. Don't you think Concordia hired them for a reason ? These guys, at Greenhill, make deals happen, and Concordia wouldn't hire them if they weren't seriously considering this.

Why is the company not giving in to all this stock volatility, short-termism, nonsense ? Because they know better. I'd rather have them working on the company, what they are actually paid for by us, the shareholders, than give in to all this market craziness. If they were, the company's G&A would explode, and we would hear whining about that, too.

If anything I don't blame MT for staying silent, I congratulate him on keeping his sight on the ball amidst all this bashing and people calling him a liar, a crook, and so forth. He's not alone in this silence. No other entity mentionned in the recent, relevant, news said a word. Blackstone, Greehill, Appolo, etc. For those saying he's paid too much, that's because you're only thinking in short-term performance of the stock price, which has nothing to do with the guy. He delivered on what he had to. Besides, I don't care. Eight million bucks is nothing compared to what Michael Pearson made ( 140 millions ). Look at the actual company numbers. They're good and private equity knows it. 

There will be a deal.

Comment by Lattice on May 03, 2016 10:26am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by CNInvesting on May 03, 2016 10:47am
I wasn't talking about the adjusted EPS Lattice. We all know that's a smokescreen. However, if we dig deeper, yes the actual EPS is negative. That's because they took debt to acquire a company. Don't you remember ? The company that will allow them to repay their debt and increase their actual EPS ? Also, don't spin it like it's a crime. It's a common practice to release ...more  
Comment by select1011 on May 03, 2016 10:53am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by wordless on May 03, 2016 11:03am
You're kidding right? An acquisition price based on EPS? You're obviously stirring up shittt as you are obviously a lot brighter than to think any acquisition is based on EPS. Especially EPS with a bunch of one-time costs in it. You're really grasping at straws now to bash a potential deal.