Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Concordia Healthcare Corp. T.CXR.R

TSX:CXR.R - Post Discussion

Concordia Healthcare Corp. > ... "Scoundrels" ...
View:
Post by TheForces on Sep 09, 2016 10:52pm

... "Scoundrels" ...

Dear LaticeInExile.  could you elaborate on this please? "the cancellation of the Restricted Shares for some directors make me think that they were hedging their RSU's.   I guess they knew something back in March. "

Very good speculation.  How would shareholders, short sellers and observers find out about this?
Comment by Lemerson on Sep 09, 2016 10:58pm
I thought they were awarded for SP performance so as the price nosedived they were cancelled. I would like an elaboration as well
Comment by TheForces on Sep 10, 2016 1:31am
The cancellation of the RSU makes sense.  https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/restricted-stock-unit.asp Nobody deserves anything for the stock price performace except extreme scrutiny, skepticism and regulatory oversight. Very curious about the hedging portion of the RSU.  Lattice seems to give clues to stimulate one's intelligence?   Delivery could sometimes be ...more  
Comment by LaticelnExile on Sep 10, 2016 9:17am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by LaticelnExile on Sep 10, 2016 9:26am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by EyeDontBelieveU on Sep 10, 2016 9:51am
LettuceInExile. Saying 'in my opinion' and 'its just my hunch' does not get you off the hook for libel or defamation. And maybe you should be tought a lesson and be sued as well. You have cost a lot of people a lot of money and destroyed pensions too. I hope you can sleep at night.  Everyone knows you are in cohoots with cohodes.  It is just unfortunate that the company ...more  
Comment by Craigbad on Sep 10, 2016 10:17am
Thats just hilarious! Lattice has smelled something rotten, dug deep and was kind enough to share research on this board saving those who listened huge amounts of capital (or made them huge amounts). The company overpaid, overleveraged, wrote off well over a half BILLION in assets, guided down, didn't see the generic competition coming (blindsided by an fda process that takes years?), didn' ...more  
Comment by Craigbad on Sep 10, 2016 10:35am
Ps. When a value money manager like Norman Levine calls a stock like this uninvestable you really have to question who is going to buy the stock or provide a bottom. If value managers won't touch it and growth managers won't touch it,  how do you expect the shareprice to go up and make you money. If your investing on the thesis that nothing else goes wrong, earnings stay flat and they ...more  
Comment by LaticelnExile on Sep 10, 2016 11:09am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by TheForces on Sep 10, 2016 12:11pm
All honest bullboard members. Please repost this "new member" EyeDontBelieveU who is not new! He is a regular Lattice basher and/or insider connected bullboard regular who magically creates an account and does advanced edits?  And does a BS legal attempt to try to drown out justice!? Meet the Masters. And the company and CEO have dug themselves so deep, no honest judge would ever, ...more  
Comment by TheForces on Sep 10, 2016 12:15pm
REPORT EyeDontBelieveU as multple accounts!  He is a known Lattice/truth attacker!  Attacker!  You will NOT squelch the truth.  The evidence is obvious and anyone who can't see that should not be investing themselves!  Attackers!  Stand back!  TheForces are coming!
Comment by LaurenceDaPill on Sep 10, 2016 2:13pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by notwrong on Sep 10, 2016 1:25pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by TheForces on Sep 10, 2016 10:49am
Amazing response. Thank you!  I'm sure a lot of shareholders here feel very sorry for having attacked you as bad as you were attacked here in public. Please check your messages, I wanted to ask you something but not in public.
Comment by Register123 on Sep 10, 2016 3:15pm
I apologize if I am asking a question that has already been answered above (unfortunately I don't have time to read through all the detailed posts), but when CXR issued their press release dated August 22, 2016 indicating the sale of just over 500,000 of Mark Thompson's shares as part of a margin call, it goes on to state “Mr. Thompson continues to hold 1,620,251 shares of Concordia.” It ...more  
Comment by oexel on Sep 10, 2016 3:25pm
I'm no conspiracy theorist, but there is a part of my brain that entertains the idea that the impairment was orchastrated to crash the price and enable someone to take over the company much more cheaply.  Maybe one of MT's cronies who will give him a kickback.
Comment by Letzmakemoney22 on Sep 10, 2016 4:53pm
Oexel:   The impairment charge accomplished two tasks.   The first was the plummeting of the share price as you mentioned but the less aparant and more damaging effect was to discredit MT and his team which is what keeps driving the price down to new year lows everyday with end in sight.
Comment by LaticelnExile on Sep 10, 2016 3:58pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by TheForces on Sep 10, 2016 5:39pm
Doesn't that mean that MT got cash when that deal was setup?  So from his perpective, that's when he really disposed of them, for cash but it was packaged as a loan with "pledged shares"? Absolutely correc to shine a giant spot light on this!  These are critical questions that need to be answered! It's unexplainable that people are here defending this type of ...more  
Comment by Hockeyz on Sep 10, 2016 9:55pm
Lati:  Your post seems extremely inaccurate.  You seem to not like to use the facts but change them as you see fit.  Firstly, you say Mr. Thomson (MT) had no problem with letting his 550k shares go.  Actually, he had no choice in the matter.  That decision was made before the strategic review began.  He pledged the shares against the debt.  I assume the debt is ...more  
Comment by oexel on Sep 10, 2016 9:59pm
Hahaha.  I just finished saying the same thing as you.  Hit submit and now I see your message.  At least there are some sane people on here.
Comment by Register123 on Sep 12, 2016 3:57pm
Lattice, you make a good point.   Why CEO Mark Thompson allowed a portion of the CXR shares he owned to be used to cover his margin call is an interesting question......Perhaps they were his most liquid asset....?.....Not many people, even very wealthy ones, have approximately $6M in cash sitting in a low-risk, highly liquid vehicle that can be accessed quickly to cover a margin call ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities