Post by
CrazyTrader on Sep 24, 2024 12:05pm
Ok, let's do an examples to determine which way Pro-Rate is
2 people tender.
example 1:
Bob tenders 3,375,000 shares
Ted tenders 100 shares.
example 2:
Bob tenders 80,000,000 shares
Ted tenders 100 shares.
Does Ted get 4 shares no matter what?
Comment by
CrazyTrader on Sep 24, 2024 12:39pm
These example show that the 4% doesn't make sense. In example #1, you can't apply 4% to Bob. Bob is going to get way more than 4%. If you can't apply 4% to Bob, then you can't apply 4% to Ted. 4% only works if every single shareholder tenders every share. Only then you can apply 4% to everyone.
Comment by
CrazyTrader on Sep 24, 2024 1:17pm
a2bman, thanks for the link to an result of an actual tender process of another company. But I couldn't figure out how number 80.9% came to be..... as such, I can not apply to our situation to understand the 4%.
Comment by
Frank007 on Sep 24, 2024 1:28pm
lol.....and yet I just bought a thou at $8.63.... lol...what a con game
Comment by
Frank007 on Sep 24, 2024 5:03pm
U r correct ...it was set up as a Dutch auction...lol...I looking back now I wish I had sold all ...and bought back in at a lower price ...lol ....it sure is a miserable con game ...like I was saying they are going to suppress the stock price to get as many people discouraged and tender their shares ....i been ...buying got some more $8.59 .....I can wait ...
Comment by
waitingstill on Sep 24, 2024 11:02pm
I mean you have to tender 100% of your shares to maximize how many will get filled.
Comment by
CrazyTrader on Sep 25, 2024 7:13am
Waitingstill, you have determined that " they must be determining the amounts based on what is tendered." So this 4%, 8% does not apply. I concure as my example shows why 4% can not be used. My original FIRST post here I think is "correct" which describes how Pro-Rate probably applies and possible outcomes.