For tinkvid, Dumont and all interested others.More than two years ago, I stated that should a globally recognized battery cells developer and manufacturer, such as Samsung, be wanting to begin producing a proprietary line of graphene enhanced battery cells for it's various customers and should such a company's name and NanoXplore be metioned within the same sentence found within a publicly disseminated NanoXplore news release, NanoXplore's share price would rocket upward to a share price which would, as a consequence, have everyone and their cousins immediately seeking to purchase NanoXplore shares.
To reiterate, I like Samsung and Hanwha Chemical, Hanwha Solutions (generally Hanwha Group"- you'll recall that both Samsung Ventures and "Hanwha" were a XG Sciences "creditors) as potential collaborating partners for anything to do with 5N or 6N silicon powder or NanoXplore's silicon-graphene "BAM" particularly.
You'll note that there are certain specific and previously mentioned corporations wanting to employ readily available and abundant lowest cost amounts of recycled 5N or 6N purity silicon powder material as comprising their respective production of either graphite-silicon anodes (see Group 14 and A123 Systems) or carbon-silicon anodes (see Tesla, Sila Nanotechnologies) and/or silicon-graphene "BAM" (see NanoXplore). These companies are most likely be purchasing said silicon material from supplying collaborators who would be aligned the owners of REC Silicon's silicon manufactring operations, as found within Moses Lake, Washington.
Again, those owners of REC Silicon happen to include both the Korea based "Hanwha" and Japan based "Komatsu".
Yes. "Hanwha" has many, many "downstream" 5N or 6N metallurgical silicon powder irons already placed in the fire, so to speak.
"NanoXplorers" would note that just one of those Hanwha specific "downstream" silicon powder comprised battery anode materials producing companies, Group 14 Technologies, has the capital investments support of Cabot Corporation (Cabot Corp was also a XG Sciences creditor") Canada's OMERS Capital Markets, Porsche AG, Microsoft Climate Innovation Fund, SK materials Decarbonization Partners, Riverstone Holdings LLC, Vsquared Ventures, Moore Strategic Ventures, Amperex Technology Limited (ATL), BASF, Showa Denko, OVP Venture Partners and StoreDot, etc.
Whilst keeping in mind the foregoing information, please note the following,
The very question which I in fact was the first to mention here a good while back, specifically as pertains to the potential for a globally recognized "Industrial Titan" to perhaps soon become more overtly involved with NanoXplore going forward, has to do with a certain company known as DowDuPont.
After NanoXplore representatives successfully negotiated the purchase of various assets from XG Sciences "creditors" and during the company's Q1/2023 conference call, I believe, Mr. Nazarpour made a statement suggesting that he hoped that possibly some of or perhaps even one of the XG Sciences Inc. "creditors" would decide to come along,
My question would quite obviously once again be, have DowDuPont representatives elected to have DowDuPont "come along" since those discussions with NanoXplore representatives and have the representatives of the world's biggest chemical conglomerate finally elected to throw their global "Industrial Titan" operating kind of invested capital in support of NanoXplore and NanoXplore's 50% co-owned VoltaXplore enterprise?