MEG Energy Corp T.MEG

SHOUTOUT: MEG 'Might' TAKE A CRACK AT Greenfire Resources ?

[ztransforms173]

See:

https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=gfr&postid=36230942

z173

[robert41]

Why? Meg has enough inventory for the next 50 years.

[ztransforms173]

- for BETTER DIVERSIFICATION and OPERATIONAL REASONS * a PLANE CRASHS into the Chistina Lake processing facilities ** GFR assets KEEP BOP FLOWING while Chistina Lake is in a MAJOR TURNAROUND - LARGER economies of SCALE resulting in LOWER PER UNIT OPERATING COSTS * SINGLE TECHNICAL and MANAGEMENT and FINANCIAL  TEAMS instead of TWO ** sharing of TRANSPORTATION and STORAGE FACILITIES

[robert41]

Hope it doesn't happen Meg has worked hard getting the float and debt down now it's growing nicely. Unless it's a great deal immediately accretive then why bother. As always the buyers shares get whacked and us shareholders are holding the bag for a year or so while they integrate the companies. Then the conversation is right back to share float and debt. I doubt it will happen Meg can

[ztransforms173]

- the EXTRA DEBT would be VERY MANAGEABLE: * USD 239 million  2028 12.00% Senior Secured Notes being REDEEMED and CALLED IN - I IMAGINE that it would be AN ALL SHARE BUYOUT with the GFR shareholders being EXTREMELY HAPPY to HAVE MEG shares [LIQIUDITY enters the chat] - with an EXTRA 22-25K bbl/d BOP, MEG 'would RAISE the MINIMUM NET DEBT LEVEL from USD 600 million to AT LEAST USD 750

[robert41]

Fair points see what happens .. being a GFR shareholder is IRRELEVANT to the ANALYSIS and DISCUSSION {you think that the BODs of MEG are going to LISTEN TO ME}... not sure what you mean I never said anything about mgmt listening to you. Highly un likely they would be reading goofy stockhouse.