Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum MEG Energy Corp T.MEG

Alternate Symbol(s):  MEGEF

MEG Energy Corp. is a Canada-based energy company focused on in-situ thermal oil production in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada. The Company is engaged in the development of enhanced oil recovery projects that utilize steam-assisted gravity drainage extraction methods to improve the economic recovery of oil. It transports and sells thermal oil (AWB) to customers throughout... see more

TSX:MEG - Post Discussion

View:
Post by retiredcf on Dec 02, 2024 8:45am

TD

ADDRESSING TWO KEY INVESTOR QUESTIONS FOLLOWING 2025 BUDGET & BUSINESS UPDATE

THE TD COWEN INSIGHT

Below we address 2 key client questions following MEG's 2025 Budget (note) and Business Update (note). Conclusions: 1) there's no reason to expect existing CL prod'n to be negatively impacted as it executes on the expansion to 135mbbl/d; 2) while 2025 prod'n guidance fell 4% short, quarterly prod'n (ex-Q2) should avg. ~105mbbl/d and, normalized for planned downtime, 2025 prod'n should grow 5% y/y.

Impact: POSITIVE

Question #1: How much could the CL Facility Expansion Project (FEP) disrupt existing base prod'n?

Key takeaway: It shouldn't at all, since the CL Facility Expansion Project (FEP), which boosts capacity to 135mbbl/d (from 110mbbl/d), triggers no change to MEG's longstanding steam optimization strategy.

MEG has no intention of prematurely transitioning steam to new well pads prior to on-streaming of its new once-through-steam-generator (OTSG). Investors therefore shouldn't expect any prod'n 'air-pockets' through project development.

Timing of steaming of new well pads will be determined using MEG's steam forecast. As pads transition from SAGD to eMSAGP (employs non-condensable gas injection), steam consumption on legacy pads falls, and becomes available for new pads. Its eMSAGP depletion strategy is considered a proven, differentiated approach to maximizing thermal efficiency, while maintaining reservoir pressure and driving down SORs.

Question #2: What are the various puts & takes on 2025 prod'n guidance landing 4% below consensus?

  • 2025 guidance was set at 95-105mbbl/d (100mbbl/d midpoint), below prior Street consensus of 104mbbl/d. Q2/25 will see a major CL Phase 2B turnaround (up to 8mbbl/ d annual impact vs. 6mbbl/d in 2022/2023). In addition, a 10-year regulatory inspection will be done alongside strategic FEP tie-ins and an interval study (facilitates the transition to once-every-4-year turnarounds, from 3). Note CL Phase 2B processes two-thirds of volumes. The last time Phase 2B underwent a turnaround (2022), Q2 prod'n averaged ~67mbbl/d, and 95mbbld annualized. In our view, a larger-than-normal turnaround points to higher potential variability. We therefore consider a conservative, wider-than- normal guidance range appropriate.

  • Ex-Q2/25, 2025 quarterly prod'n is expected to average ~105mbbl/d, with an H2/25 acceleration as two higher reservoir-quality pads ramp. Normalized for turnarounds, 2025 volumes are expected to grow a respectable 5% y/y.

    Bottom-line: We do not expect CL base prod'n to be negatively impacted through FEP development, CL vols should avg. ~105mbbl/d (ex-Q2), and 2025 vols should grow 5% y/y on a normalized basis.



Comment by ztransforms173 on Dec 02, 2024 10:48am
- these INVESTORS are REAL DUMMIES ! - you THINK that MEG would PURPOSELY DEGRADE PRODUCTION when they SPEND an ENORMOUS amount of TIME & ENGINEERING RESOURCES TO OPTIMIZE MAXIMUM BOP with the MINIMUM of CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT - the ONLY REASON that the LARGE Q2/2025 TURNAROUND {~ 35 days instead of the 31 days in 2022} has 2,920,000 LOST BOP BARRELS is they NEED the EXTRA DOWNTIME to PASS a 10 ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities