Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Protox Therapeutics Inc T.PRX

TSX:PRX - Post Discussion

View:
Post by cabbieJBJ on Dec 15, 2009 11:48am

NR - When?

Invite the board to weigh in on when and what.

My take at this point is the Protox has had the data long enough to do the analyses.  If the results were dissapointing there woudl have been a NR, imo.  Therfore, I this suggests that they are shopping the results to interested business partners and possibly venture capital folks (an option to proceed with phase 3 without a partner if deals are not compelling).

The waiting is killing me. 

HELP!
Comment by bioboy10 on Dec 15, 2009 12:57pm
I agree, they must have a idea of what they have. I also think that with the stock still acting fairly strong is a good indication that the news is positive, or not enough to tank the stock.phase 3 would require a lot of money and time, any idea of how much it would cost ?. Partnering would be the way to go.I am willing to wait for next year, as after this week there will be little interest in the ...more  
Comment by cabbieJBJ on Dec 15, 2009 1:09pm
I seem to recall that Phase 2b cost was in the $5 million range - but I'm really guessing.  Phase 3 would run 3-4X that amount, assuming that the design will mirror 2b - which is a reasonable assumption if efficacy holds and side effects/adverse reaction remain a non issue.  They may only need to extend 2b to a larger population base to confirm statistical significance. 
Comment by major3 on Dec 15, 2009 2:04pm
There will be no news until the first week of January (good or bad). You can bet they have had the raw data for the past few weeks and yes they could be in the process of negotiating deals if the data is positive. I see no reason why the results in this study would be any different from what they got on Phase 2a. Any Placebo effect would be short term as those participants with the placebo would ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities