Sherritt International Corp T.S

Proxy vote

[BackporchBob]

Long time holder here.
Looking for some direction on how to vote.
I have not been able to keep up with amanagement team at Sherritt.

[Nickbull]

I have faith in Leon and steering us into a growth phase. It will take him some time to make adjustments. I'm not sure that there is a growth path trough the fort site without some major changes. I don't believe they can squeeze a whole lot more production out of the fort site. The fort site has an overhead issue that I would like to see him tackle. Further to my opinion is they look at

[rkhosla]

I think they still have some deadweight dinosaurs on their board. Their board members continue not to have any skin in the game besides shares that have been granted as part of their ridiculous pay packages.   However they have had good turn over this year with the addition of Lo and Hancock (both whom i like - Lo especially) and retirement of free Loader.  So this year I will support

[autofocus111]

The Canadian government is throwing billions in subsidies at metals mining and processing. It will be very disappointing if S can't figure out a way to cash in on that vis a vis their refining ops.

[Maxmoe]

Huh? Billions? Politicians subsidize new production, new facilities, new jobs. Not existing players. Unless maybe if they are big in Quebec like bbd. They like bulldozers and shovel photo ops with union reps and First Nations. Nothing for sherritt.

[Contrarian333]

Last year I withheld votes for Sir Richard and Adrian Loader as Chairman and Chair of Comp Committee respectively.  The withhold on Sir Richard had to to with the level of corporate expenses (and I didn't want to express that vote through Pathe who had just negotiated a non dilutive reorg of debt).  The withhold on Adrian had to do with the breadth of retention bonuses paid to

[FCPlady]

I voted against say on pay. S still hasn't learned to turn off the pay taps.  The phatom share grants make little sense since so much of their share price  is tied to the price of nickel and not performance.  What did the grant recipients do to earn the huge bonus they'll get if nickel doubles in price over the 3 year vesting period?