Seabridge Gold Inc T.SEA

There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

[Shermandrock1]

Rudi, kindly call Ken at 1-604-559-8092. Ken, kindly call Rudi at 1-416-367-9292. You should arrange for a private meeting then simultaneously drop your drawers and measure up. That accomplished and out of they way, you need to initiate a plan for the way forward. Yes, both projects are "world class". However, if they are not brought into production, they are "world stupid". Continued litigation and "egoation" is the path that does not lead to success. Projects like each of these are uncommon. That said, each party should recognize the location of these projects and the development difficulties they will individually encounter. Working together, there will be ample opportunity for knowledge and cost sharing and cost avoidance. Lastly folks, please do not continue down the path of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. There is ample opportunity for multiple winners here. All shareholders deserve to benefit from the development of these projects. It is not just the Rudi & Ken show. Please pick up the phones and initiate the makings of a legacy project.

[cskhurasu]

TC has no value to SEA. KSM has more than enough ore for the next hundred years and the TC ore is not compatible. With the LOO, SEA does not need TUD's agreement. TC has yet to prove it has an economic deposit. KK needs to show he has a real opportunity before there is a reason to meet.

[GoldDigger60]

That's wishful thinking Except for TC not needing to spend how many millions on a tunnel?? It seems likely TC would be looked at more favourably by a major. 

[fairdinkem]

The price tag for the tunnels is multiple Billions of Dollars, not millions.  So AMK does have a very powerful edge in getting first to the Ore processing plant/the "Mill". Plus they have grade very near serface so minimul cost for upstrart "CAPEX" right out the gate for AMK.

[cskhurasu]

Sorry to put a few facts in your way but the price tag for the tunnels is a little les than $1b and it solves a big issue cost-effectively...where to put the tailings. This is what got KSM its Environmental Assessment Certificate. KSM has a ridiculously low strip ratio of one-to-one which is very low for such a large project. All five deposits come to surface. TUD should be so lucky. The super

[fordster]

Is this the same reason Rick Rules seems to be overly negative about you guys? ...It sure sounds like it.

[curtis111]

You're right, but they need a permit. That's where this turns into an issue for Seabridge. They will not be granted a permit to go through mineralization

[curtis111]

I honestly think this is an easy issue to work together on. 

[GoldDigger60]

One can hope they're working on a solution 

[TELEMARKER]

SEA will buyout TUO

[GoldDigger60]

What are your thoughts of this?  Wouldn't it be less expensive if they upped the Cunningham offer on amk? Either one gives them 20%

[GuruNN]

Seabridge should buy Teuton?   Never!   What advantage should Seabridge have from this?   Tudor, as 60% partner of the three Amigos, has contractually agreed with the 20% partners that it can make all decisions concerning Treaty Creek on its own. Until the mining decision is made, all exploration costs will be borne by Tudor.    A look at the history books

[TELEMARKER]

no cash, just 5 million SEA shares

[NineLives]

Tele, that equates to about $1.80 per share for TUO. So even though TUO owns the nsr's plis 20% you're saying TUO could be bought cheaper than AMK's $207 million takeover.  20 million shares might get a response, might.

[fordster]

"Officially" lol lol lol

[GoldDigger60]

CSK. Check out slide 23 https://wp-tudorgold-2023.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2024-08-22-TUDOR_GOLD_CORP_Presentation.pdf

[cskhurasu]

There are problems wth TUD's Slide 23 comparison table. First, there is no such thing as a gold equivalent. No one serious uses it. Second, the SEA numers are wrong...the KSM resources are much larger...88.7 million m&i ounces is gold only plus another 71.5 million gold only ounces in inferred..KSM also has 19.6 billion pounds of m7i copper35.8 billion pounds of inferred copper. This

[fordster]

Everyone still uses gold equivalent....so you quote one "gold guru" that it's not accurate, how ever it's routinely used by everyone. Your argument doesn't apply. ...all your BS posts on our BB. Folks, CSK is the single reason TUDOR people are here posting. and yes, Rudi should return Ken's communications: but he's not.

[cskhurasu]

Combining copper with gold to up the grade is silly. The copper is a by product used to reduce operating costs IF IT IS RECOVERABLE and the last data from TUD indicates most of the Treaty Creek copper is likely not recoverable and may ven be a hindrance to recovering the gold efficiently.

[fordster]

No, Seabridge is trying to pull in a copper miner to do all the work. Thus, Seabridge must declare copper as a separate revenue...otherwise Seabridge would be using the same terminology. No "hollier-than-now" here. Strategic plan that must be followed to lure them into the far far far side of the mountain. Hey, any nibbles yet? I haven't heard of any. I can't say I would invest

[fordster]

BTW...CSK you're smoking something. There's no report from Tudor that even implies difficulty with the copper. Let's just pretend there is...we've got domains within domains of mineralization. The characteristics change with each domain. Caught you in a big fib!

[GoldDigger60]

When you're stuck on the other side without a tunnel, you have to make up stuff to try to shine a light on yourself.