I am pretty sure this is a new presentation
https://www.sulliden.com/Theme/Sulliden/files/110704_Sulliden%20Corporate%20Presentation_v001_w4x03q.pdf
...new for July anyways. I believe they have made a few updates.
Some interesting points
slide 14 - similar soils in the region have yielded 10% -35% better grades that when drill results have shown. SUE is going to try and prove, by drilling bigger holes on top of existing ones, that grades are better then the resource statement reflects
slide 9 - mineral resource statement was for central corridore only, lots of drilling has taken place in the NW, south and N corridor...these can probably be converted to resources with very little effort
slide 11 - They seem to the sulphides at depth could be profitable to mine and not just the oxides. Not entirely sure what the difference between the two is, I will have to do some research...anyone have any input? If they are looking at this I imagine it is low cost as well?
Appendix - Basically on how Peru is not as risky as people think.
GLTA