Comment by
HighteawithIntrepid on May 12, 2015 1:01pm
RR Logically every time we tick a box the odds of ticking the next box increases so the share price should improve as we close in on the final approval. However, when we delayed our filing by 90 days we added ,1800,000 to our cash burn more or less so the other side of the coin is only having enough cash to get to September not December. HT
Comment by
RetailRube on May 12, 2015 2:06pm
HT, I don't understand why you say our cash burn increased by $1.8m. Since our cash burn is salaries, and we have the same number of people no matter when we submit, and revenue is in 2016 at best anyway, how has our cash exhaustion date moved from December to September? Are you sure?
Comment by
bayoubucks on May 12, 2015 2:42pm
HT, do you work for the government in accounting?
Comment by
RetailRube on May 12, 2015 3:03pm
OK, I see the difference in our perspectives. You assumed we would have cash inflow in 2015 from first customer ship. I assumed we had to wait until final FDA approval which was always in 2016 (1Q-2016 for a while, then 2Q-2016 on the latest presentation). In my world, they will run out of cash (still) in 4Q-2015. The delay in filing the BLA has not changed that.
Comment by
HighteawithIntrepid on May 13, 2015 7:53am
RR Under a March filing my expectation was that the September 2015 warrants would be a cash flow event, but now not so much as the acceptance of the filing is not a given before they expire.
Comment by
blartar on May 13, 2015 10:02am
HT don't concern yourself about the Sept. 2015 warrants. Management loaded up on lots of OPTIONS @ .30-.40 to replace them when they exspire.That probably puts them in the right hands now. JMHO