Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Yukon Nevada Gold Corp T.YNG

TSX:YNG - Post Discussion

Yukon Nevada Gold Corp > Inducement Warrants
View:
Post by romara on Oct 19, 2009 8:54pm

Inducement Warrants

I have spent the day reading past NR's...re-reading post....and thinking.We have two sets of Inducement Warrants ....Sprott et al and the Orifer warrants.

Lets' look at the Sprott warrants first and how they came about. Sprott and a few other funds and people financed YNG to keep it afloat when bank or convention financing was not available....If it had not got the financing....YNG would probably had gone under....so they deserse some special rewards for their actions ....that is what the Inducement Form in front of us now,,,,to agree to give Sprott the Inducement warrants at their agreed upon prices ....this was all part of the deal.

I am going to vote "For" for these Inducement Warrants

Now we can talk about the Orifor Inducement Warrants.....now if these are not passed by the voting shareholders and the TSX certain things will happen....one thing is Orifer will not get commanding and effective controll of the company. The price of these warrants have not been fixed yet........here below is how they are fixed from the NR dated Oct 14, 2009

"
The Class A warrants have an expiry date of December 19, 2009 and the Class B warrants have an expiry date of June 19, 2010. If a holder elects to exercise an Existing Warrant, the Company would issue to that holder an inducement warrant (the "Inducement Warrant"), representing the same number of shares as the Existing Warrants exercised by the holder. The Inducement Warrant would be exercisable for 24 months from the date of issuance at a price that is the Company's shares' volume weighted average trading price as traded on the TSX for the five days immediately following issuance of this news release. The holders only have until November 13, 2009 to exercise Existing Warrants in order to qualify for Inducement Warrants.

As you can see the strike price on these warrants is based on a 5 day average from Thursday Oct. 15, 2009 until close of trading Wed. Oct. 21, 2009.

Also there is this part of the NR

3. if the TSX approval or Company shareholder approval is not obtained within 30 days, the Company must repay the Loan within 14 days from such date.

If we do approve these Inducement Warrants this what happens

"Upon exercise of the Inducement Warrants and the Warrants, Orifer would then hold 270,000,000 shares, being 45.75% of the Company's then issued and outstanding share capital. Therefore the exercise of the Existing Warrants and Inducement Warrants by Orifer could materially affect control of the Company, as set out in the policies of TSX."

So we have 2 choices either not approve the Inducement Warrants ....then the company would have to pay back as per Para 3 above ...can we survive ...maybe...could get secondary financing....a white knight might just come floating by....or we can raise the funds ourself through a subscription...with warrants of course

I, myself will not be voting "For" the Orifer Inducement Warrants ....I would rather see the existing share holders have subscription rights through an offering with warrants attached.

Or if we approve the Orifer Inducement Warrants, Orifer will end up with effective control of this YNG

So, what do want to do fight....or sit back....   I really think the press should get involved....even the Finance Minister...foriegn company steals BC gold company from the Canadian shareholders....Maybe talk with the boys at Sprott.........Just my thoughts tonight.......Richard

....I would rather see the existing share holders have subscription rights through an offering with warrants attached.
Comment by inshula on Oct 19, 2009 9:40pm
I voted NO you must have these inducement warrants because no one in his right mind would agree to this deal it is so outrages for the ordinary shareholder 
Comment by romara on Oct 19, 2009 9:53pm
inshula...you haven't voted on the Orifer Inducement Warrents yet....they haven't started canvasing for them ...nobody has........Richard
Comment by AIMer300 on Oct 19, 2009 11:05pm
Richard wrote:...foriegn company steals BC gold company from the Canadian shareholders........I would rather see the existing share holders have subscription rights through an offering with warrants attached.I agree...let's fight the Orifer inducement warrants!Regarding Sprott, they provided capital to YNG some months ago in exchange for cheap shares and warrants.  Their action ...more  
Comment by romara on Oct 19, 2009 11:09pm
AIMer....as far as as Sprott goes....we need them on our side if it's going to work......do you want rights....and warrants??????.Who do you know in the investment community who has a large position in YNG, Go to them , call your local paper's business editor...spred the word.........Richard
Comment by AIMer300 on Oct 19, 2009 11:26pm
Richard, it would help to have a big shareholder like Sprott on our side.However, if Sprott is able to take advantage of inducement warrants, they might not be in a position to say 'no' to inducement warrants for Orifer.The proposal looks like a well-thought-out strategy by Orifer to get control of YNG, considering that they might be the ones orchestrating ...more  
Comment by romara on Oct 20, 2009 8:40am
AIMer....To my knowledge the Sprott Inducement Warrants were laid back when Sprott and other large funds advanced YNG funds to keep going....and probably to protect their original investment. Financing then was hard to comeby.Now as far as Orifer SA is concerned....I got a feeling that they just hopped on the Inducement Warrant band wagon looking for the quick seizure of the company. Their man was ...more  
Comment by indyng on Oct 20, 2009 8:51am
Romara: Forgive me for asking a dumb question. What would happen to YNG if Orifer SA gets a hold of the company?Thanks
Comment by romara on Oct 20, 2009 8:55am
They have it now, with the new directors in place, and if they get the Inducement Warrents approved.....they will have absolute control of the company.....jus look at the latest NR....they have replaced existing directors with their own nominees.....that's how the "New" inducement warrents came about....it smell......Richard
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities