Yukon Nevada Gold Corp T.YNG

courier at your earliest convenience

[arthur7440]

courier at your earliest convenience. (If sent by fax or e-mail, please mail the originally executed document
to our offices.) We would appreciate your response by October 30, 2009, and therefore your co-operation in
this regard is much appreciated.
2
490 - 688 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6B 1P1
tel: [phone] fax: [phone] e-mail: [e-mail]
Fax Email Courier
[phone] [e-mail] 490 - 688 West Hastings St.
Vancouver, BC V6B 1P1




YUKON-NEVADA GOLD CORP.
Per: “Robert F. Baldock”
Robert F. Baldock
President and
Chief Executive Officer
To approve the proposed issuance of Inducement Warrants which are exercisable at a price of $0.128 per
share for 30 months from closing, as set out in the Company’s letter dated September 17, 2009.

FOR (____) AGAINST (____)
I confirm as follows:

(a) that I have read and understand the terms of the proposed Inducement Warrants summarized in this
letter;

(b) I have no interest in the Existing Warrants or am ineligible in participating in the proposed issuance
Inducement Warrants;

(c) I own, or exercise control or direction, over ____________ shares of the Company; and

(d) If the aforesaid resolution were to be voted on at a meeting of shareholders of the Company, I
would vote in favour of the resolution.
(Signature of shareholder) (Name of shareholder - please print)
(Phone Number) (Email Address)

YOU HAVE TO COPY AND MAIL THIS PART ASAP

[eldreco]

Do you not think line D to be a double negative?  If you vote agin the grain in the for / against box..but you accept line D - doesn't that screw the vote?  Any takers on this question?Tia.\d

[arthur7440]

  Your quite right,  they sure are a sneaky bunch,  You would also think that all share holders that are long on this stock would have gotten the information, that Richard and myself and only a few others got?/                       They sure tryed to pull a fast one on us,&

[inshula]

I voted against and crossed out in favour in the last line and wrote against .. This is or should be illegal and hopefully the exchange sees this skam on decieving the voters hopfully squashes the deal... thats hoping they do or someone challenges this in court .

[jimbalea]

Is this the one for Sprout that you are voting for?  I know it is the one for Orifer that you all don't want.  Just want to be clear as to which one this is for.     Le'a

[romara]

jim...they are Sprott first....the one for ORIFER is not out yet....Richard