Hello AmericanInv et al,
You’ll excuse the tardiness of ones reply.
First and foremost, one does not in any way subscribe to the human mental constructed called “luck.”
Nevertheless, given that you seem to believe in this thing called “luck”, one would expect that you had wished yourself that which you would call “luck”; it appears as though you would require plenty of it, eh.
It would not surprise one in the least to witness the Tranzeo share price plummet toward previous lows.
Moreover, should one practice the art of shorting, one would have once again marked this company as a prime candidate for an aggressive “short campaign” – a short campaign which you have not seen to date.
Think about it, AmericanInv.
It certainly appears as though the only way to actually generate more ROI as a shareholders of any sort would be to short this thing into the ground.
Given the amount of debt and unavoidable “share dilution” (approximately 9 Million shares or so) which this company’s representatives had ensured to weigh the share price down with going forward, one would expect that
.20 cents or so would not be an impossible achievement – some could suggest that such a share price would be appropriate.
Once again; CannO’Crap representatives strike again.
Those characters over at CannO’Crap are considered to be quite the lot of …, eh.
Perhaps that analyst who had been calling for that $2.00 or so share price should now be taken behind the shed and …
Furthermore, your “hope” would quite clearly present as having been misplaced, AmericanInv.
One would now expect that the whole kitten caboodle, i.e. the overall “control” of this Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc/Aperto Networks enterprise, is slated to be accumulated/consolidated and then shifted shuffled, dealt and perhaps once gain re-dealt away into the hands of certain perhaps privately operating and “most interested parties.”
Think Intellectual Properties, AmericanInv.
After all, that’s about all the valuation of the combined enterprise is ever based on.
The Intellectual Properties which this “publicly trading” securities issuer named Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc has been allowed to control are, as one understands it to be the case, being “leveraged” by the as yet unnamed Aperto “stakeholder” or “stakeholders.”
That’s correct; taking the intellectual Properties in question into the control of another perhaps most interested party or parties is all that this Aperto play presents as being all about.
One could very well suspect that ant appreciably large equipment contracts would be “reserved” for the company (or group of companies) which respectively stand to benefit from any “requisite consolidation” and outright “control” of such Intellectual Properties.
Hang on to your hat and your shorts, eh.
Sherbet2